You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently, I was faced with a feature that could be solved by using datapackage-views-js. One of my first actions was to search for the package in NPM's registry.
Unfortunately, I felt confused because there were two packages with the same name. Also, the latest tagged version in Git – v1.2.0 – is not available in any of the published packages. I felt confused and wondering if the package was actually being maintained.
Expectation
I expected to see only one package available. I also expected to see v1.2.0 as the latest stable version available.
Proposal
The problems suggest that the publication of the package does not happen automatically, but manually by one of the developers. Travis CI configuration supports this hypothesis. Wouldn't that be a good opportunity to automate this task?
Delete one of the packages from NPM's registry.
Automate the task of publishing the package to NPM's registry.
Background
Recently, I was faced with a feature that could be solved by using datapackage-views-js. One of my first actions was to search for the package in NPM's registry.
Problems
https://www.npmjs.com/search?q=datapackage-views-js
Unfortunately, I felt confused because there were two packages with the same name. Also, the latest tagged version in Git – v1.2.0 – is not available in any of the published packages. I felt confused and wondering if the package was actually being maintained.
Expectation
I expected to see only one package available. I also expected to see v1.2.0 as the latest stable version available.
Proposal
The problems suggest that the publication of the package does not happen automatically, but manually by one of the developers. Travis CI configuration supports this hypothesis. Wouldn't that be a good opportunity to automate this task?
cc @anuveyatsu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: