paper.bib

@article{anstead_social_2015,
	title = {Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion: The 2010 Uk General Election},
	volume = {20},
	issn = {1083-6101},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12102},
	doi = {10.1111/jcc4.12102},
	shorttitle = {Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion},
	abstract = {Social media monitoring in politics can be understood by situating it in theories of public opinion. The multimethod study we present here indicates how social media monitoring allow for analysis of social dynamics through which opinions form and shift. Analysis of media coverage from the 2010 {UK} General Election demonstrates that social media are now being equated with public opinion by political journalists. We use interviews with pollsters, social media researchers and journalists to examine the perceived link between social media and public opinion. In light of competing understandings these interviews reveal, we argue for a broadening of the definition of public opinion to include its social dimension.},
	pages = {204--220},
	number = {2},
	journaltitle = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
	shortjournal = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication},
	author = {Anstead, Nick and O'Loughlin, Ben},
	urldate = {2021-06-07},
	date = {2015-03-01},
	keywords = {news, twitter},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/WI4IKSVJ/Anstead and O'Loughlin - 2015 - Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion The 2010.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/KLCDF6HJ/4067564.html:text/html}
}

@article{broersma_twitter_2013,
	title = {Twitter as a News Source – How Dutch And British Newspapers Used Tweets in Their News Coverage, 2007–2011},
	volume = {7},
	doi = {10.1080/17512786.2013.802481},
	abstract = {Twitter has become a convenient, cheap and effective beat for journalists in search of news and information. Reporters today increasingly aggregate information online and embed it in journalism discourse. In this paper, we analyse how tweets have increasingly been included as quotes in newspaper reporting during the rise of Twitter from 2007 to 2011. The paper compares four Dutch and four British national tabloids and broadsheets, asking if tabloid journalists are relying more on this second-hand coverage than their colleagues from quality papers. Moreover, we investigate in which sections of the paper tweets are included and what kinds of sources are quoted. Consequently, we present a typology of the functions tweets have in news reports. Reporters do include these utterances as either newsworthy or to support or illustrate a story. In some cases, individual tweets or interaction between various agents on Twitter even triggers news coverage. We argue that this new discursive practice alters the balance of power between journalists and sources.},
	pages = {446--464},
	journaltitle = {Journalism Practice},
	shortjournal = {Journalism Practice},
	author = {Broersma, Marcel and Graham, Todd},
	date = {2013-08-01},
	keywords = {news, twitter},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/IBJWUPXE/Broersma and Graham - 2013 - Twitter as a News Source – How Dutch And British N.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{armstrong_now_2010,
	title = {Now Tweet This: How News Organizations Use Twitter},
	volume = {4},
	issn = {1931-2431},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243110389457},
	doi = {10.1177/1931243110389457},
	shorttitle = {Now Tweet This},
	abstract = {This content analysis examined how Twitter is used as a content dissemination tool within the news industry. Using Gans’ conception of news values as a theoretical framework, this study looked at tweets of nine news organizations during a 4-month period to determine how individuals, links, news headlines and subject areas were employed within the 140-character limits. Results indicated that regional media tended to differ in Twitter usage from both local and national media and that broadcast news agencies were more likely to tweet multimedia packages than were print-based organizations. Crime and public affairs were the most tweeted topics. Implications of results were discussed.},
	pages = {218--235},
	number = {4},
	journaltitle = {Electronic News},
	shortjournal = {Electronic News},
	author = {Armstrong, Cory L. and Gao, Fangfang},
	urldate = {2021-06-07},
	date = {2010-12-01},
	langid = {english},
	note = {Publisher: {SAGE} Publications Inc},
	keywords = {news, twitter}
}

@inproceedings{gruppi_tweeting_2021,
	title = {From Tweeting About News to Creating News Around Tweets: Characterizing Tweets Embedded in News Articles},
	abstract = {Content from Twitter has been largely used as source material in news articles, journalists may use tweets to support a claim or to estimate public opinion. Such content often features in news articles in the form of embedded tweets. Despite the prominence of Twitter in journalism, little work has been done towards characterizing the use of tweets in news articles. We present a study to describe the utilization of tweets by news sources of different credibility levels. Specifically, we show the differences in tweets embedded by reliable and unreliable sources in terms of quantity and quality, the topics they cover, and the individuals they cite. Our results exhibit quantitative differences between the sources of distinct credibility. They also point to discrepancies in the narratives that arise around the same tweet due to the different intentions of each news source.},
	eventtitle = {{ICWSM}-2021},
	pages = {4},
	booktitle = {Mediate Workshop},
	author = {Gruppi, Maurıcio and Adalı, Sibel and Salemi, Matthew and Horne, Benjamin D},
	date = {2021-06},
	langid = {english},
	keywords = {news, twitter},
	file = {Gruppi et al. - From Tweeting About News to Creating News Around T.pdf:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/WHSXZZ5H/Gruppi et al. - From Tweeting About News to Creating News Around T.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@article{gruppi_nela-gt-2020_2021,
	title = {{NELA}-{GT}-2020: A Large Multi-Labelled News Dataset for The Study of Misinformation in News Articles},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04567},
	shorttitle = {{NELA}-{GT}-2020},
	abstract = {In this paper, we present an updated version of the {NELA}-{GT}-2019 dataset, entitled {NELA}-{GT}-2020. {NELA}-{GT}-2020 contains nearly 1.8M news articles from 519 sources collected between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020. Just as with {NELA}-{GT}-2018 and {NELA}-{GT}-2019, these sources come from a wide range of mainstream news sources and alternative news sources. Included in the dataset are source-level ground truth labels from Media Bias/Fact Check ({MBFC}) covering multiple dimensions of veracity. Additionally, new in the 2020 dataset are the Tweets embedded in the collected news articles, adding an extra layer of information to the data.},
	journaltitle = {{arXiv}:2102.04567 [cs]},
	author = {Gruppi, Maurício and Horne, Benjamin D. and Adalı, Sibel},
	urldate = {2021-06-07},
	date = {2021-02-08},
	eprinttype = {arxiv},
	eprint = {2102.04567},
	keywords = {news, twitter},
	file = {arXiv Fulltext PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/EZXANHMG/Gruppi et al. - 2021 - NELA-GT-2020 A Large Multi-Labelled News Dataset .pdf:application/pdf;arXiv.org Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/AL76W4HG/2102.html:text/html}
}

@article{mujib_newstweet_2020,
	title = {{NewsTweet}: A Dataset of Social Media Embedding in Online Journalism},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02870},
	shorttitle = {{NewsTweet}},
	abstract = {The inclusion of social media posts---tweets, in particular---in digital news stories, both as commentary and increasingly as news sources, has become commonplace in recent years. In order to study this phenomenon with sufficient depth, robust large-scale data collection from both news publishers and social media platforms is necessary. This work describes the construction of such a data pipeline. In the data collected from Google News, 13\% of all stories were found to include embedded tweets, with sports and entertainment news containing the largest volumes of them. Public figures and celebrities are found to dominate these stories; however, relatively unknown users have also been found to achieve newsworthiness. The collected data set, {NewsTweet}, and the associated pipeline for acquisition stand to engender a wave of new inquiries into social content embedding from multiple research communities.},
	journaltitle = {{arXiv}:2008.02870 [cs]},
	author = {Mujib, Munif Ishad and Heidenreich, Hunter Scott and Murphy, Colin J. and Santia, Giovanni C. and Zelenkauskaite, Asta and Williams, Jake Ryland},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2020-08-06},
	eprinttype = {arxiv},
	eprint = {2008.02870},
	file = {arXiv Fulltext PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/CLDM4VTE/Mujib et al. - 2020 - NewsTweet A Dataset of Social Media Embedding in .pdf:application/pdf;arXiv.org Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/ZM3F4RHY/2008.html:text/html}
}

@article{paulussen_social_2014,
	title = {Social Media References in Newspapers},
	volume = {8},
	issn = {1751-2786},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327},
	doi = {10.1080/17512786.2014.894327},
	abstract = {Social media are increasingly being used as sources in mainstream news coverage. Yet, while the research so far has focused mainly on the use of social media in particular situations, such as breaking news coverage, during crisis news events or in times of elections, little attention is paid to journalists' routine, day-to-day monitoring of social media platforms. The aim of this study is to examine the use and selection of social media as sources in routine newspaper coverage. First, it presents a quantitative overview of all the articles published between January 2006 and December 2013 in the print editions of two Flemish (north Belgian) quality newspapers, De Standaard and De Morgen, that explicitly refer to Facebook, Twitter or {YouTube}. Next, a content analysis is conducted of a sample of newspaper articles published in 2013 that explicitly mention Facebook, Twitter or {YouTube} as sources of information. The goal of this content analysis is to examine the different appearances and functions of social media references in the news. The study thus provides a first insight into Belgian newspaper journalists' regular sourcing routines in relation to social media.},
	pages = {542--551},
	number = {5},
	journaltitle = {Journalism Practice},
	author = {Paulussen, Steve and Harder, Raymond A.},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2014-09-03},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327},
	file = {Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/7EJQRTNB/17512786.2014.html:text/html}
}

@article{lecheler_re-evaluating_2016,
	title = {Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources},
	volume = {18},
	issn = {1461-4448},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412},
	doi = {10.1177/1461444815600412},
	shorttitle = {Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age},
	abstract = {This review article provides a critical discussion of empirical studies that deal with the use of online news sources in journalism. We evaluate how online sources have changed the journalist–source relationship regarding selection of sources as well as verification strategies. We also discuss how the use of online sources changes audience perceptions of news. The available research indicates that journalists have accepted online news sourcing techniques into their daily news production process, but that they hesitate to use information retrieved from social media as direct and quoted sources in news reporting. Studies show that there are differences in the use of online sources between media sectors, type of reporting, and country context. The literature also suggests that verification of online sources requires a new set of skills that journalists still struggle with. We propose a research agenda for future studies.},
	pages = {156--171},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {New Media \& Society},
	shortjournal = {New Media \& Society},
	author = {Lecheler, Sophie and Kruikemeier, Sanne},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2016-01-01},
	langid = {english},
	note = {Publisher: {SAGE} Publications}
}

@article{noauthor_state_2019,
	title = {The State of Social Embeds},
	url = {https://cdn.samdesk.io/static-content/The-State-of-Social-Embeds.pdf},
	pages = {9},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2019},
	langid = {english},
	file = {The State of Social Embeds.pdf:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/XKDLRAV4/The State of Social Embeds.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@online{molyneux_when_2021,
	title = {When journalists put tweets in news stories, do they transfer too much power to Twitter?},
	url = {https://www.niemanlab.org/2021/03/when-journalists-put-tweets-in-news-stories-do-they-transfer-too-much-power-to-twitter/},
	abstract = {Journalists have transferred some of their own power over the presentation of current events to Twitter by normalizing the ways tweets are presented in news stories.},
	titleaddon = {Nieman Lab},
	author = {Molyneux, Logan and {McGregor}, Shannon},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2021-03-26},
	file = {Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/GS6UHCSB/when-journalists-put-tweets-in-news-stories-do-they-transfer-too-much-power-to-twitter.html:text/html}
}

@article{horne_nela-gt-2020_2021,
	title = {{NELA}-{GT}-2020},
	url = {https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/CHMUYZ},
	doi = {10.7910/DVN/CHMUYZ},
	abstract = {Dataset for article "{NELA}-{GT}-2020: A Large Multi-Labelled News Dataset for the Study of Misinformation in News Articles" https://arxiv.org/abs/2102...},
	author = {Horne, Benjamin and Gruppi, Mauricio},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2021-02-23},
	langid = {english},
	note = {Publisher: Harvard Dataverse
type: dataset}
}

@article{heravi_twitter_2016,
	title = {Twitter journalism in Ireland: sourcing and trust in the age of social media},
	volume = {19},
	issn = {1369-118X},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187649},
	doi = {10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187649},
	shorttitle = {Twitter journalism in Ireland},
	abstract = {Twitter has been widely adopted into journalistic workflows, as it provides instant and widespread access to a plethora of content about breaking news events, while also serving to disseminate reporting on those events. The content on Twitter, however, poses several challenges for journalists, as it arrives unfiltered, full of noise, and at an alarming velocity. Building on the results of the first national survey of social media use in Irish newsrooms, this paper investigates the adoption of social media into journalistic workflows, journalists’ attitudes towards various aspects of social media, and the content and perspectives generated by these online communities. It particularly investigates how Twitter shapes the processes of sourcing and verification in newsrooms, and assesses how notions of trust factor into the adoption of the Twitter platform and content into these processes. The paper further analyses relationships between journalist profile and adopted practices and attitudes, and seeks to understand how Twitter operates in the current journalistic landscape. While this paper draws its data from a survey of journalists in Ireland, the analysis of the relationship between trust, sourcing, and verification reveals broader patterns about journalistic values, and how these values and practices may operate in the field of journalism as a whole.},
	pages = {1194--1213},
	number = {9},
	journaltitle = {Information, Communication \& Society},
	author = {Heravi, Bahareh Rahmanzadeh and Harrower, Natalie},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2016-09-01},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187649},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/UHUTCWTK/Heravi and Harrower - 2016 - Twitter journalism in Ireland sourcing and trust .pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/SXB6SJBL/1369118X.2016.html:text/html}
}

@article{hermida_tweets_2012,
	title = {Tweets and Truth},
	volume = {6},
	issn = {1751-2786},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667269},
	doi = {10.1080/17512786.2012.667269},
	abstract = {This paper examines how social media are influencing the core journalistic value of verification. Through the discipline of verification, the journalist establishes jurisdiction over the ability to objectively parse reality to claim a special kind of authority and status. Social media question the individualistic, top-down ideology of traditional journalism. The paper considers journalism practices as a set of literacies, drawing on the theoretical framework of new literacies to examine the shift from a focus on individual intelligence, where expertise and authority are located in individuals and institutions, to a focus on collective intelligence where expertise and authority are distributed and networked. It explores how news organizations are negotiating the tensions inherent in a transition to a digital, networked media environment, considering how journalism is evolving into a tentative and iterative process where contested accounts are examined and evaluated in public in real-time.},
	pages = {659--668},
	number = {5},
	journaltitle = {Journalism Practice},
	author = {Hermida, Alfred},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2012-10-01},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667269},
	file = {Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/45CZ2Y55/17512786.2012.html:text/html}
}

@article{vis_twitter_2013,
	title = {Twitter as a Reporting Tool for Breaking News},
	volume = {1},
	issn = {2167-0811},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.741316},
	doi = {10.1080/21670811.2012.741316},
	abstract = {This study focuses on journalists Paul Lewis (The Guardian) and Ravi Somaiya (The New York Times), the most frequently mentioned national and international journalists on Twitter during the 2011 {UK} summer riots. Both actively tweeted throughout the four-day riot period and this article highlights how they used Twitter as a reporting tool. It discusses a series of Twitter conventions in detail, including the use of links, the taking and sharing of images, the sharing of mainstream media content and the use of hashtags. The article offers an in-depth overview of methods for studying Twitter, reflecting critically on commonly used data collection strategies, offering possible alternatives as well as highlighting the possibilities for combining different methodological approaches. Finally, the article makes a series of suggestions for further research into the use of Twitter by professional journalists.},
	pages = {27--47},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {Digital Journalism},
	author = {Vis, Farida},
	urldate = {2021-06-09},
	date = {2013-02-01},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.741316},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/DN8DYZBZ/Vis - 2013 - Twitter as a Reporting Tool for Breaking News.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/HCHH9SWA/21670811.2012.html:text/html}
}

@article{molyneux_legitimating_2021,
	title = {Legitimating a platform: evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter},
	volume = {0},
	issn = {1369-118X},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037},
	doi = {10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037},
	shorttitle = {Legitimating a platform},
	abstract = {Studies suggest a growing interdependence between journalists and Twitter. What is behind this interdependence, and how does it manifest in news texts? We argue that social media platforms (and Twitter in particular) have situated themselves as purveyors of legitimated content, a projection that journalists have not fully challenged and at times abetted. Instead, journalists rely on these platforms both for access to powerful users and as conduits to surface the words of ‘ordinary people.’ This practice treats tweets more like content, an interchangeable building block of news, than like sources, whose ideas and messages must be verified. Using a corpus of U.S. news stories with tweets in them, we provide empirical evidence for our argument of the power of platforms to legitimate speech and shape journalism. This study illuminates journalists’ role in transferring some of the press’s authority to Twitter, thereby shaping the participants in and content of public deliberation.},
	pages = {1--19},
	number = {0},
	journaltitle = {Information, Communication \& Society},
	author = {Molyneux, Logan and {McGregor}, Shannon C.},
	urldate = {2021-06-25},
	date = {2021-01-31},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874037},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/ZJ5ITEHJ/Molyneux and McGregor - 2021 - Legitimating a platform evidence of journalists’ .pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/2YAL32GJ/1369118X.2021.html:text/html}
}

@article{rony_large-scale_2018,
	title = {A Large-scale Study of Social Media Sources in News Articles},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.13078},
	abstract = {In this study, we closely look at the use of social media contents as source or reference in the U.S. news media. Specifically, we examine about 60 thousand news articles published within the 5 years period of 2013-2017 by 153 U.S. media outlets and analyze use of social media content as source compared to other sources. We designed a social media source extraction algorithm and investigated the extent and nature of social media source usage across different news topics. Our results show that uses of social media content in news almost doubled in five years. Unreliable media outlets rely on social media more than the mainstream media. Both mainstream and unreliable sites prefer Twitter to Facebook as a source of information.},
	journaltitle = {{arXiv}:1810.13078 [cs]},
	author = {Rony, Md Main Uddin and Yousuf, Mohammad and Hassan, Naeemul},
	urldate = {2021-07-09},
	date = {2018-10-30},
	eprinttype = {arxiv},
	eprint = {1810.13078},
	file = {arXiv Fulltext PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/DDDRCYWS/Rony et al. - 2018 - A Large-scale Study of Social Media Sources in New.pdf:application/pdf;arXiv.org Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/27UM57EW/1810.html:text/html}
}

@article{mcgregor_social_2019,
	title = {Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion},
	volume = {20},
	issn = {1464-8849},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458},
	doi = {10.1177/1464884919845458},
	shorttitle = {Social media as public opinion},
	abstract = {Public opinion, as necessary a concept it is to the underpinnings of democracy, is a socially constructed representation of the public that is forged by the methods and data from which it is derived, as well as how it is understood by those tasked with evaluating and utilizing it. I examine how social media manifests as public opinion in the news and how these practices shape journalistic routines. I draw from a content analysis of news stories about the 2016 {US} election, as well as interviews with journalists, to shed light on evolving practices that inform the use of social media to represent public opinion. I find that despite social media users not reflecting the electorate, the press reported online sentiments and trends as a form of public opinion that services the horserace narrative and complements survey polling and vox populi quotes. These practices are woven into professional routines – journalists looked to social media to reflect public opinion, especially in the wake of media events like debates. Journalists worried about an overreliance on social media to inform coverage, especially Dataminr alerts and journalists’ own highly curated Twitter feeds. Hybrid flows of information between journalists, campaigns, and social media companies inform conceptions of public opinion.},
	pages = {1070--1086},
	number = {8},
	journaltitle = {Journalism},
	shortjournal = {Journalism},
	author = {{McGregor}, Shannon C},
	urldate = {2021-07-14},
	date = {2019-08-01},
	langid = {english},
	note = {Publisher: {SAGE} Publications}
}

@article{roberts_media_2021,
	title = {Media Cloud: Massive Open Source Collection of Global News on the Open Web},
	volume = {15},
	rights = {Copyright (c) 2021 Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence},
	issn = {2334-0770},
	url = {https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/18127},
	shorttitle = {Media Cloud},
	abstract = {We present the first full description of Media Cloud, an open source platform based on crawling hyperlink structure in operation for over 10 years, that for many uses will be the best way to collect data for studying the media ecosystem on the open web. We document the key choices behind what data Media Cloud collects and stores, how it processes and organizes these data, and its open {API} access as well as user-facing tools. We also highlight the strengths and limitations of the Media Cloud collection strategy compared to relevant alternatives. We give an overview two sample datasets generated using Media Cloud and discuss how researchers can use the platform to create their own datasets.},
	pages = {1034--1045},
	journaltitle = {Proceedings of the International {AAAI} Conference on Web and Social Media},
	author = {Roberts, Hal and Bhargava, Rahul and Valiukas, Linas and Jen, Dennis and Malik, Momin M. and Bishop, Cindy Sherman and Ndulue, Emily B. and Dave, Aashka and Clark, Justin and Etling, Bruce and Faris, Robert and Shah, Anushka and Rubinovitz, Jasmin and Hope, Alexis and D'Ignazio, Catherine and Bermejo, Fernando and Benkler, Yochai and Zuckerman, Ethan},
	urldate = {2021-11-04},
	date = {2021-05-22},
	langid = {english},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/M7EZNZA5/Roberts et al. - 2021 - Media Cloud Massive Open Source Collection of Glo.pdf:application/pdf}
}

@software{python-readability,
	author = {{Baburov, Yuri}},
	title = {{Python-readability: fast python port of arc90's readability tool, updated to match latest readability.js!}},
	year = {2021},
	publisher = {GitHub},
	journal = {GitHub repository},
	url = {https://github.com/buriy/python-readability}
}

@misc{beautifulsoup,
	author = {{Richardson}},
	title = {{Beautiful Soup: a Python library for pulling data out of HTML and XML file}},
	year = {2021},
	publisher = {launchpad},
	journal = {launchpad project},
	url = {https://code.launchpad.net/beautifulsoup/+code}
}

@online{twitter_help,
	title = {How to embed a Tweet on your website or blog},
	url = {https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/how-to-embed-a-tweet},
	abstract = {Interested in embedding a Tweet on your website or blog? Here's how.},
	urldate = {2021-11-04},
	langid = {english},
	file = {Snapshot:/Users/rahulb/Zotero/storage/QLWXLLFH/how-to-embed-a-tweet.html:text/html}
}

@misc{selenium,
	author = {Stewater, Barantsev, Evas, et. al.},
	title = {{selenium: Python language bindings for Selenium WebDriver}},
	year = {2021},
	publisher = {GitHub},
  journal = {GitHub repository},
	url = {https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/tree/trunk/py}
}

@misc{pycld2,
	author = {Alrfou, R.},
	title = {{PYCLD2 - Python Bindings to CLD2}},
	year = {2021},
	publisher = {GitHub},
  journal = {GitHub repository},
  url = {https://github.com/aboSamoor/pycld2}
}

@misc{goose3,
  author = {Grangier, Xavier and Barrus, Tyler and Sidorov, Ilya et al.},
  title = {{Goose3: A Python 3 compatible version of goose}},
  year = {2019},
  publisher = {GitHub},
  journal = {GitHub repository},
  url = {https://github.com/goose3/goose3}
}

@misc{requests,
	author = {Reitz, Benfield, Cordasco, et. al.},
	title = {{requests: a simple, yet elegant, HTTP library}},
	year = {2021},
	publisher = {GitHub},
	journal = {GitHub repository},
	url = {https://github.com/psf/requests}
}