You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The schema documentation for the xml:lang attribute states that allowed values are "IETF BCP 47, ISO 639-1 language codes, e.g. en, de, fr". This seems a bit contradictory since BCP 47, as far as I can tell, allows a lot more than just ISO 639-1. Is everything allowed by BCP 47 valid?
Related to the above: is there a recommended format? We are having some problems with https://citation.crosscite.org/ not picking up the english title of our datasets, and I was wondering if this is due to the fact that we are using "en" (ISO 630-1) instead of "en-US" or "en-GB".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The schema documentation for the xml:lang attribute states that allowed values are "IETF BCP 47, ISO 639-1 language codes, e.g. en, de, fr". This seems a bit contradictory since BCP 47, as far as I can tell, allows a lot more than just ISO 639-1. Is everything allowed by BCP 47 valid?
Related to the above: is there a recommended format? We are having some problems with https://citation.crosscite.org/ not picking up the english title of our datasets, and I was wondering if this is due to the fact that we are using "en" (ISO 630-1) instead of "en-US" or "en-GB".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: