-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Failures on [co19] Roll co19 to 044cf88601e2ac6054c1fe39706be837c1471278 #3039
Comments
(Just noticed "and 9 more tests". In future cases, is it possible to show those tests when this kind of issue is created? It seems likely that it would be helpful to have the complete list in some situations, given that it is considered helpful to have the list at all.) |
I always use the list of tests from the CL, so for me it's not a problem to have a short list in the descrioption. Triage result is:
|
OK, so I guess there is no reason why we'd want to ensure that the list of failing tests is complete? Taking one step back, what is the intended purpose of this issue? I guess it's autogenerated ('Aggregated test results' has a button to create something like this). In the case where the CL is abandoned it seems reasonable to conclude that this issue simply doesn't matter. This isn't known when the issue is created, but the issue can then be closed, and nobody will think about it any more. When the CL is not abandoned (and all new tests are considered to be non-bad), and it reveals a number of test failures, an issue of this kind would serve a purpose: It documents that a certain set of tests are failing, and tools should be modified such that they succeed. However, we're actually handling that part in a different way: Each kind of test failure is described in a separate issue which is mentioned in the approval comment of the given test. Does this mean that this particular kind of issue (even with a CL which has been landed) is actually not used for anything? In that case it's certainly not important to make sure that the list of failing tests is complete. ;-) |
Yes, this issue (and all issues of that kind) is generated by the 'Create GitHub issue' button on the 'Aggregated Test Results' page. The list of tests in the description is also generated by the script that runs when the 'Create GitHub issue' button is pressed. I use this process only when the CL contains test issues that need to be fixed. In these cases, the CL is always abandoned. I'm not sure if there is a written rule somewhere, but I follow this: every commit should have an issue number. Therefore, I create an issue to make it clear that the commit addresses new roll failures in different tests. So, I think we simply don't encounter situations where there is a 'Roll failures' issue, but the CL is not abandoned. |
OK, thanks! |
2025-01-10 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#3039. Fix the new roll failures (dart-lang/co19#3040) 2025-01-10 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add constant expressions tests. Part 4. (dart-lang/co19#3037) 2025-01-09 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add constant expressions tests (dart-lang/co19#3024) 2025-01-09 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#3030. Add additional test checking non const in a const constructor initializer list (dart-lang/co19#3036) 2025-01-09 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add grammar tests for shorthand with different operators. (dart-lang/co19#3027) 2025-01-08 [email protected] Fixes dart-lang/co19#3028. Add tests for mixin application constant constructor (dart-lang/co19#3032) 2025-01-08 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add constant expressions tests.Part 3. (dart-lang/co19#3026) 2025-01-08 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add constant expressions tests.Part 2. (dart-lang/co19#3025) 2025-01-06 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add more equality tests (dart-lang/co19#3023) 2025-01-01 49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com Bump actions/setup-java from 4.5.0 to 4.6.0 in the github-actions group (dart-lang/co19#3033) 2024-12-20 [email protected] dart-lang/co19#2976. Add more tests for shorthand equality (dart-lang/co19#3022) Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:analyzer-linux-release-try Change-Id: Ic8becbc8de5c560f3e9294a47d727442df7c733f Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/403982 Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alexander Thomas <[email protected]>
There are new test failures on [co19] Roll co19 to 044cf88601e2ac6054c1fe39706be837c1471278.
The tests
are failing on configurations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: