Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider running buildx on a docker container instead of host #279

Open
pablomendezroyo opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Consider running buildx on a docker container instead of host #279

pablomendezroyo opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
P1 Has to be done but not urgent

Comments

@pablomendezroyo
Copy link
Contributor

The command buildx is used by the SDK to create arm and amd architecture images. If this docker plugin is not available in the host then the sdk will not work.

Consider using the buildx inside a docker container instead from the host machine

Ref: https://docs.docker.com/build/install-buildx/
@pablomendezroyo pablomendezroyo added the P0 Address issue now label May 9, 2023
@pablomendezroyo
Copy link
Contributor Author

pablomendezroyo commented May 9, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This would make the sdk agnostic of the host environment and would lead to much less errors and even windows/mac compatibility

cc @3alpha @Marketen @dsimog01

@pablomendezroyo pablomendezroyo added P1 Has to be done but not urgent and removed P0 Address issue now labels May 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
P1 Has to be done but not urgent
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pablomendezroyo