👍🎉 First off, thanks for taking the time to contribute! 🎉👍
The following is a set of guidelines for contributing to useCornify.
This project and everyone participating in it is governed by the useCornify Code of Conduct. By participating, you are expected to uphold this code. Please report unacceptable behavior to [email protected].
This section guides you through submitting a bug report for useCornify. Following these guidelines helps maintainers and the community understand your report 📝, reproduce the behavior 💻 💻, and find related reports 🔎.
When you are creating a bug report, please include as many details as possible.
Note: If you find a Closed issue that seems like it is the same thing that you're experiencing, open a new issue and include a link to the original issue in the body of your new one.
Bugs are tracked as GitHub issues.
Explain the problem and include additional details to help maintainers reproduce the problem:
- Use a clear and descriptive title for the issue to identify the problem.
- Describe the exact steps which reproduce the problem in as many details as possible.
- Provide specific examples to demonstrate the steps. Include links to files or GitHub projects, or copy/pasteable snippets, which you use in those examples. If you're providing snippets in the issue, use Markdown code blocks.
- Describe the behavior you observed after following the steps and point out what exactly is the problem with that behavior.
- Explain which behavior you expected to see instead and why.
- If the problem wasn't triggered by a specific action, describe what you were doing before the problem happened and share more information using the guidelines below.
Provide more context by answering these questions:
- Did the problem start happening recently (e.g. after updating to a new version of useCornify) or was this always a problem?
- If the problem started happening recently, can you reproduce the problem in an older version of useCornify? What's the most recent version in which the problem doesn't happen? You can download older versions of useCornify from the releases page.
- Can you reliably reproduce the issue? If not, provide details about how often the problem happens and under which conditions it normally happens.
This section guides you through submitting an enhancement suggestion for useCornify, including completely new features and minor improvements to existing functionality. Following these guidelines helps maintainers and the community understand your suggestion 📝 and find related suggestions 🔎.
When you are creating an enhancement suggestion, please include as many details as possible.
Enhancement suggestions are tracked as GitHub issues. Create an issue on this repository and provide the following information:
- Use a clear and descriptive title for the issue to identify the suggestion.
- Provide a step-by-step description of the suggested enhancement in as many details as possible.
- Provide specific examples to demonstrate the steps. Include copy/pasteable snippets which you use in those examples, as Markdown code blocks.
- Describe the current behavior and explain which behavior you expected to see instead and why.
- Explain why this enhancement would be useful to most useCornify users.
Unsure where to begin contributing to useCornify? You can start by looking through these beginner
and help-wanted
issues:
- [Beginner issues][beginner] - issues which should only require a few lines of code, and a test or two.
- [Help wanted issues][help-wanted] - issues which should be a bit more involved than
beginner
issues.
Both issue lists are sorted by total number of comments. While not perfect, number of comments is a reasonable proxy for impact a given change will have.
The process described here has several goals:
- Maintain useCornify's quality
- Fix problems that are important to users
- Enable a sustainable system for useCornify's maintainers to review contributions
Please follow these steps to have your contribution considered by the maintainers:
- After you submit your pull request, verify that all status checks are passing
What if the status checks are failing?
If a status check is failing, and you believe that the failure is unrelated to your change, please leave a comment on the pull request explaining why you believe the failure is unrelated. A maintainer will re-run the status check for you. If we conclude that the failure was a false positive, then we will open an issue to track that problem with our status check suite.
While the prerequisites above must be satisfied prior to having your pull request reviewed, the reviewer(s) may ask you to complete additional design work, tests, or other changes before your pull request can be ultimately accepted.
- Use the present tense ("Add feature" not "Added feature")
- Use the imperative mood ("Move cursor to..." not "Moves cursor to...")
- Limit the first line to 72 characters or less
- Reference issues and pull requests liberally after the first line
- When only changing documentation, include
[ci skip]
in the commit title - Consider starting the commit message with an applicable emoji:
- 🎨
:art:
when improving the format/structure of the code - 🐎
:racehorse:
when improving performance - 🚱
:non-potable_water:
when plugging memory leaks - 📝
:memo:
when writing docs - 🐧
:penguin:
when fixing something on Linux - 🍎
:apple:
when fixing something on macOS - 🏁
:checkered_flag:
when fixing something on Windows - 🐛
:bug:
when fixing a bug - 🔥
:fire:
when removing code or files - 💚
:green_heart:
when fixing the CI build - ✅
:white_check_mark:
when adding tests - 🔒
:lock:
when dealing with security - ⬆️
:arrow_up:
when upgrading dependencies - ⬇️
:arrow_down:
when downgrading dependencies - 👕
:shirt:
when removing linter warnings
- 🎨
All Typeschript must follow rules as stated in .prettierrc file.