You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How hard would it be to extend it to allow completion also for arguments?
Let's say, for example, I have an command, that can only be called in the following way to be valid: set_state RUNNING, set_state WAITING and set_state TERMINATED.
I want to have completion of set_state R to set_state RUNNING in this case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you @dos4boss for the idea: it would be great to have completion on arguments.
Before that, however, the library should be able to manage "enumeration" arguments (i.e., a string argument that can assume only a finite set of values).
In particular, the library should be able to handle "user-defined arguments" in the first place (see issue #69).
How hard would it be to extend it to allow completion also for arguments?
Let's say, for example, I have an command, that can only be called in the following way to be valid:
set_state RUNNING
,set_state WAITING
andset_state TERMINATED
.I want to have completion of
set_state R
toset_state RUNNING
in this case.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: