Open
Description
We have an initiative (cucumber/common#1550) to remove some technical debt in the cucumber/common repo around publishing read-only subrepos from the monorepo. We'd like to remove/archive these read-only repos altogether, and the scripts that copy code into them.
As part of this, we need to update godog to reference the common modules (gherkin etc) via a path within the common repo, rather than the subrepo. See @aurelien-reeves's comment here.
I'm not all that familiar with the go ecosystem, but I can probably figure out a PR for this.
What I'm not sure is about the deployment process. If we make a release of godog with the new module paths, will end users have to upgrade if we then archive the subrepos?