You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ASCII armor is widely used, so we should support it.
Ideally we'd support it transparently, so we should add support for it directly to the parsers in src/packet.rs. We also want to support writing it, so a new function to_armor should be added to Packet.
Reading through RFC4880 section 6 would be a good start here. For an initial implementation throwing away the armor headers would be acceptable, but eventually we'll want to support those too, which will require some refactoring of Packet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ASCII armor is widely used, so we should support it.
Ideally we'd support it transparently, so we should add support for it directly to the parsers in
src/packet.rs
. We also want to support writing it, so a new functionto_armor
should be added toPacket
.Reading through RFC4880 section 6 would be a good start here. For an initial implementation throwing away the armor headers would be acceptable, but eventually we'll want to support those too, which will require some refactoring of
Packet
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: