You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is something like a shards-cache: true option something that the maintainers would be open to as a part of this action? I haven't worked with writing GitHub actions before, so I wanted to make sure there was an appetite to review a PR before taking the time to learn and implement one.
This would reduce the common copy-and-paste that I do to every Crystal project, which generally does these steps every time:
Hi.
This action was first developed when caching by custom actions was not only an extreme rarity, but there wasn't even API access to it. Now the situation is totally opposite and indeed I am convinced that caching shards should be a part of this.
I may be opposed to adding even more extra features. E.g. shards-cache-additional-paths I would not like because it merely clumps 2 separate steps into one without any benefit.
Finally, a pull request. It would be good, thanks. Although, I am likely to be picky regarding the approach. In other case, eventually I will get around to this myself.
First of all, thank you for providing this amazing GitHub Action! It's been a really great addition to my CI workflows.
Something I've found a lot of value in with the
ruby/setup-ruby
action is the ability to runbundle install
and cache the gems as a part of the action with thebundler-cache: true
option.Is something like a
shards-cache: true
option something that the maintainers would be open to as a part of this action? I haven't worked with writing GitHub actions before, so I wanted to make sure there was an appetite to review a PR before taking the time to learn and implement one.This would reduce the common copy-and-paste that I do to every Crystal project, which generally does these steps every time:
My hope would be that these steps could be reduced to (naming TBD):
Or, if you didn't use something like Ameba and didn't do matrix testing against old Crystal versions, something as simple as:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: