Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PF feedback (opnsense) #308

Open
LaurenceJJones opened this issue Jul 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

PF feedback (opnsense) #308

LaurenceJJones opened this issue Jul 15, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@LaurenceJJones
Copy link
Contributor

"Don't generate Rules"
-- this would allow to add a selfdefined rule to the interface of your liking, usually WAN only.
At the moment, we get a floating rule for all interfaces, which isn't very optimal since i have a lot of vlan communication between interfaces.
Opnsense is the router for all networks

Adding as an issue so user can track the outcome

@mmetc
Copy link
Contributor

mmetc commented Aug 21, 2023

In the pfsense plugin, we create the ipv4/ipv6 rules (which are not editable nor shown in the interface) but they can be disabled. The user is free to add their own.

Screenshot from 2023-08-21 10-51-07

Is this enough if we do the same for opnsense? I understand an explicit selection of the interface would be preferable, we would need to see how this translates in both opnsense and pfsense

@LaurenceJJones
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ramalama2

@mmetc mmetc changed the title PF feedback PF feedback (opnsense) Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants