Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Allow resource configuration to provide additional state file values #299

Open
justin-watkinson-cherre opened this issue Aug 29, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@justin-watkinson-cherre

What problem are you facing?

I used terrajet to generate Apigee resources from the standard GCP terraform provider. The generation aspect worked as expected, however I was never able to fully get it to work end-to-end.

What ultimately ends up happening is that because the name attribute is not an input to the resource, it is excluded from the terraform.tfstate created by terrajet. However, the GCP provider does appear to require the name attribute to exist in the tfstate.

I can verify this by stopping the controller and manually visiting the terraform tmp directory created in the terrajet controller (via the log outputs). To make the commands work I remove the lifecycle prevent_destroy block from the main.tf.json file.

If I manually execute a terraform refresh on the originally created state file, it will back-up the terraform.tfstate and leave a new one that is mostly empty, minus the id field and provider information. A terraform plan on that state will result in the provider attempting to replace something which doesn't exist.

However, if I modify the state file to include a name field that is correctly formatted, it correctly determines that it can create the resource.

I tried every variation of settings but I could never arrive at a solution that did not also put the name field into the module inputs, which is an error as this resource does not support a name attribute.

How could Terrajet help solve your problem?

Right now, terrajet offers the ability to template and render the id field for a variety of cases (via the GetIDFn) (docs).

If we could extend this behavior to other attributes which will render fully, but only in the statefile and not the resource inputs, it would allow me to work around this issue.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant