From a40f2f8f4dd65922531b84da7744a6f0d079acab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Olivier @ CREATIS" <olivier.bernard@creatis.insa-lyon.fr>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:08:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update
 collections/_posts/2024-10-20-tabular-explainability.md

Co-authored-by: Nathan Painchaud <23144457+nathanpainchaud@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 collections/_posts/2024-10-20-tabular-explainability.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/collections/_posts/2024-10-20-tabular-explainability.md b/collections/_posts/2024-10-20-tabular-explainability.md
index 0d023a2c..fc620810 100755
--- a/collections/_posts/2024-10-20-tabular-explainability.md
+++ b/collections/_posts/2024-10-20-tabular-explainability.md
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ prediction was defined as that which corresponds to the highest attention value
 <img src="/collections/images/tabular_explainability/explanation_distribution.jpg" width=700></div>
 <p style="text-align: center;font-style:italic">Figure 4 - Best concept group distribution per method</p>
 
-* For each method, the proportion of samples who considered each concept group to be the best is indicated
+* For each method, the proportion of samples that considered each concept group to be the best is indicated
 * For each dataset, the number of incorrectly classified samples is less than 5%, which has no impact in the overall distributions
 * MLA appears to take more groups than SA and SH into account when identifying differences among samples