We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There are quite a few actually helpful clang tidy issues. Many of these can be seen when scrolling through this log.
Yet these are quite easy to handle.
The purpose of this issue is to handle meaningful clang-tidy messages in a minimally-invasive way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Matt (@mborland) in the spirit of moving forward, I plan to remove:
llvm-else-after-return
readability-else-after-return
due to lack of tangible value. These are getting in the way of meaningful messages.
Is this OK for you?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hi Matt (@mborland) in the spirit of moving forward, I plan to remove: remove: llvm-else-after-return remove readability-else-after-return due to lack of tangible value. These are getting in the way of meaningful messages. Is this OK for you?
remove: llvm-else-after-return
remove readability-else-after-return
That's good with me. I find that sonarlint gives fewer messages than clang tidy but they seem to be higher quality.
Basically all the activated/removed rules can be found here.
Line 45 activates everything via the *. Then subsequently specific rules or wildcard rule-sets are disabled with the minus sign.
*
ckormanyos
No branches or pull requests
There are quite a few actually helpful clang tidy issues. Many of these can be seen when scrolling through this log.
Yet these are quite easy to handle.
The purpose of this issue is to handle meaningful clang-tidy messages in a minimally-invasive way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: