Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ICS2: Think through delay period options #533

Open
cwgoes opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

ICS2: Think through delay period options #533

cwgoes opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
brainstorming Open-ended brainstorming. feature Possible future feature. tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer.

Comments

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Dec 15, 2020

And how to push to application, secondary queues, etc. etc.
@ethanfrey
Copy link
Contributor

I'm curious. Can you expand a bit more? (I assume this is a personal placeholder issue).

This is when you set/change the per-channel delay period and how that change can safely propagate over all other components in this distributed system which is IBC?

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Dec 16, 2020

Yes, this is a placeholder issue from a meeting. The basic idea is that it would be preferable to push the delay period choice out to the application level so that applications can consider the contents of a packet (e.g. how much value is being transferred) and their state (e.g. how much value has been transferred recently) in order to determine what delay period should be imposed for whatever safety guarantees are desired.

@cwgoes cwgoes transferred this issue from cosmos/ibc Feb 23, 2021
@cwgoes cwgoes transferred this issue from another repository Mar 23, 2021
@mpoke mpoke added tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer. brainstorming Open-ended brainstorming. labels Mar 17, 2022
@mpoke mpoke changed the title Think through delay period options ICS2: Think through delay period options Mar 17, 2022
@mpoke mpoke added the feature Possible future feature. label Mar 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
brainstorming Open-ended brainstorming. feature Possible future feature. tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ethanfrey @mpoke @cwgoes