-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathdiabetes.names
138 lines (137 loc) · 4.41 KB
/
diabetes.names
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
| .names file created by George John, October 1994
| This data seems to be the same as the irvine pima database.
| See the diabetes.irvinediff file for the differences. They all seem
| to be formatting differences (eg 0.1 vs 0.100).
|
|1. TITLE
| Pima Indians Diabetes Database
|
|2. USE IN STATLOG
| 2.1- Testing Mode
| 12 Fold Cross-Validation
|
| 2.2- Special PreProcessing
|
| 2.3- Test Results
|
| Success Rate TIME
| Algorithm Train Test Train Test
| --------------------------------------------
| LogDisc 78.09 77.700 31 7
| Dipol92 ? 77.600
| Discrim 78.01 77.500 27.3 6
| Smart 82.27 76.800 314 ?
| Radial ? 75.700
| Itrule ? 75.500
| BackProp ? 75.200
| Cal5 76.8 75.000 40 1
| Cart 77.31 74.500 61 2
| Castle 73.97 74.200 29 4
| QuaDisc 76.28 73.800 24 6
| Bayes 76.07 73.800 2 1
| C4.5 86.92 73.000 12 1
| IndCart 92.14 72.900 18 17
| BayTree ? 72.900
| LVQ ? 72.800
| Kohonen ? 72.700
| Ac2 100 72.400 648 29
| NewId 100 71.100 10 10
| Cn2 98.98 71.100 38 3
| Alloc80 71.24 69.900 115 ?
| KNN 100 67.600 1 2
| Default ? 65.000
| Cascade ? 0.00
|
|
|3. SOURCES and PAST USAGE
| 3.1 SOURCES
| (a) Original owners: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and
| Kidney Diseases
| (b) Donor of database: Vincent Sigillito ([email protected])
| Research Center, RMI Group Leader
| Applied Physics Laboratory
| The Johns Hopkins University
| Johns Hopkins Road
| Laurel, MD 20707
| (301) 953-6231
| (c) Date received: 9 May 1990
|
| 3.2 Past Usage:
| 1. Smith,J.W., Everhart,J.E., Dickson,W.C., Knowler,W.C., \&
| Johannes,R.S. (1988). Using the ADAP learning algorithm to forecast
| the onset of diabetes mellitus. In "Proceedings of the Symposium
| on Computer Applications and Medical Care" (pp. 261--265). IEEE
| Computer Society Press.
|
| The diagnostic, binary-valued variable investigated is whether the
| patient shows signs of diabetes according to World Health Organization
| criteria (i.e., if the 2 hour post-load plasma glucose was at least
| 200 mg/dl at any survey examination or if found during routine medical
| care). The population lives near Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
|
| Results: Their ADAP algorithm makes a real-valued prediction between
| 0 and 1. This was transformed into a binary decision using a cutoff of
| 0.448. Using 576 training instances, the sensitivity and specificity
| of their algorithm was 76% on the remaining 192 instances.
|
| 4. DATASET DESCRIPTION
|
| NUMBER of EXAMPLES: 768
|
| NUMBER of CLASSES: 2
| 1, 2
| (class value 1 is interpreted as "tested positive for
| diabetes")
| Class Distribution:
| Class Value Number of instances
| 1 500 (65.1%)
| 2 268 (34.9%)
|
| NUMBER of ATTRIBUTES: 8
|
| 1. Number of times pregnant
| 2. Plasma glucose concentration a 2 hours in an oral
| glucose tolerance test
| 3. Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
| 4. Triceps skin fold thickness (mm)
| 5. 2-Hour serum insulin (mu U/ml)
| 6. Body mass index (weight in kg/(height in m)^2)
| 7. Diabetes pedigree function
| 8. Age (years)
|
| Brief statistical analysis:
|
| Attribute number: Mean: Standard Deviation:
| 1. 3.8 3.4
| 2. 120.9 32.0
| 3. 69.1 19.4
| 4. 20.5 16.0
| 5. 79.8 115.2
| 6. 32.0 7.9
| 7. 0.5 0.3
| 8. 33.2 11.8
|
| Missing Attribute Values: None
|
|
| Relevant Information:
| Several constraints were placed on the selection of these instances
| from a larger database. In particular, all patients here are females
| at least 21 years old of Pima Indian heritage.
| ADAP is an adaptive learning routine that generates and executes
| digital analogs of perceptron-like devices. It is a unique algorithm;
| see the paper for details.
|
|CONTACTS
|
1,2.
A1: continuous.
A2: continuous.
A3: continuous.
A4: continuous.
A5: continuous.
A6: continuous.
A7: continuous.
A8: continuous.