From cc9eda043cd48f751484e7ffb4ae6cc2938acc45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ID Bot <idbot@example.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 21:43:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Script updating gh-pages from 7e3bffc. [ci skip]

---
 .../draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.html        | 31 ++++++++++---------
 .../draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.txt         | 12 ++++---
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.html b/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.html
index 2b7b5e8..979be13 100644
--- a/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.html
+++ b/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.html
@@ -2916,6 +2916,10 @@ <h3 id="name-normative-references">
         <dd>
 <span class="refAuthor">Bormann, C.</span> and <span class="refAuthor">Z. Shelby, Ed.</span>, <span class="refTitle">"Block-Wise Transfers in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)"</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">RFC 7959</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">DOI 10.17487/RFC7959</span>, <time datetime="2016-08" class="refDate">August 2016</time>, <span>&lt;<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7959">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7959</a>&gt;</span>. </dd>
 <dd class="break"></dd>
+<dt id="RFC7967">[RFC7967]</dt>
+        <dd>
+<span class="refAuthor">Bhattacharyya, A.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Bandyopadhyay, S.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Pal, A.</span>, and <span class="refAuthor">T. Bose</span>, <span class="refTitle">"Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Option for No Server Response"</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">RFC 7967</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">DOI 10.17487/RFC7967</span>, <time datetime="2016-08" class="refDate">August 2016</time>, <span>&lt;<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7967">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7967</a>&gt;</span>. </dd>
+<dd class="break"></dd>
 <dt id="RFC8075">[RFC8075]</dt>
         <dd>
 <span class="refAuthor">Castellani, A.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Loreto, S.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Rahman, A.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Fossati, T.</span>, and <span class="refAuthor">E. Dijk</span>, <span class="refTitle">"Guidelines for Mapping Implementations: HTTP to the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)"</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">RFC 8075</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">DOI 10.17487/RFC8075</span>, <time datetime="2017-02" class="refDate">February 2017</time>, <span>&lt;<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8075">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8075</a>&gt;</span>. </dd>
@@ -3037,10 +3041,6 @@ <h3 id="name-informative-references">
         <dd>
 <span class="refAuthor">Hui, J.</span> and <span class="refAuthor">R. Kelsey</span>, <span class="refTitle">"Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (MPL)"</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">RFC 7731</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">DOI 10.17487/RFC7731</span>, <time datetime="2016-02" class="refDate">February 2016</time>, <span>&lt;<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7731">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7731</a>&gt;</span>. </dd>
 <dd class="break"></dd>
-<dt id="RFC7967">[RFC7967]</dt>
-        <dd>
-<span class="refAuthor">Bhattacharyya, A.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Bandyopadhyay, S.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Pal, A.</span>, and <span class="refAuthor">T. Bose</span>, <span class="refTitle">"Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Option for No Server Response"</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">RFC 7967</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">DOI 10.17487/RFC7967</span>, <time datetime="2016-08" class="refDate">August 2016</time>, <span>&lt;<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7967">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7967</a>&gt;</span>. </dd>
-<dd class="break"></dd>
 <dt id="RFC8323">[RFC8323]</dt>
         <dd>
 <span class="refAuthor">Bormann, C.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Lemay, S.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Tschofenig, H.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Hartke, K.</span>, <span class="refAuthor">Silverajan, B.</span>, and <span class="refAuthor">B. Raymor, Ed.</span>, <span class="refTitle">"CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets"</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">RFC 8323</span>, <span class="seriesInfo">DOI 10.17487/RFC8323</span>, <time datetime="2018-02" class="refDate">February 2018</time>, <span>&lt;<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8323">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8323</a>&gt;</span>. </dd>
@@ -4290,34 +4290,37 @@ <h3 id="name-version-11-to-12">
         </h3>
 <ul class="normal">
 <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.1">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.1.1">Generalized resending of a group request with different Message ID.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.1.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.1.1">Made RFC 7967 a normative reference.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.1.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.2">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.2.1">Switched <span class="bcp14">SHOULD</span> to <span class="bcp14">MAY</span> on changing port number from group request to response.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.2.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.2.1">Generalized resending of a group request with different Message ID.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.2.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.3">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.3.1">Further generalized the handling of multiple responses from the same server to the same request.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.3.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.3.1">Switched <span class="bcp14">SHOULD</span> to <span class="bcp14">MAY</span> on changing port number from group request to response.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.3.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.4">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.4.1">Clarifications on response suppression.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.4.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.4.1">Further generalized the handling of multiple responses from the same server to the same request.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.4.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.5">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.5.1">Mentioned PROBING_RATE as a means to enforce congestion control.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.5.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.5.1">Clarifications on response suppression.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.5.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.6">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.6.1">Consideration on how eventual consistency from Observe compensates for lost notifications.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.6.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.6.1">Mentioned PROBING_RATE as a means to enforce congestion control.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.6.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.7">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.7.1">Admitted resource retrieval through consecutive group requests with the Block2 Option.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.7.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.7.1">Consideration on how eventual consistency from Observe compensates for lost notifications.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.7.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.8">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.8.1">Clarified relation with TCP/TLS/WebSockets.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.8.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.8.1">Admitted resource retrieval through consecutive group requests with the Block2 Option.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.8.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.9">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.9.1">Clarified security on the different legs with a proxy.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.9.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.9.1">Clarified relation with TCP/TLS/WebSockets.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.9.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
           <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.10">
-            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.10.1">Editorial improvements.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.10.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.10.1">Clarified security on the different legs with a proxy.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.10.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+</li>
+          <li class="normal" id="appendix-E.1-1.11">
+            <p id="appendix-E.1-1.11.1">Editorial improvements.<a href="#appendix-E.1-1.11.1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </li>
         </ul>
 </section>
diff --git a/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.txt b/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.txt
index 75ae093..a9c8127 100644
--- a/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.txt
+++ b/christian-post-wglc-review/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis.txt
@@ -2896,6 +2896,11 @@ Table of Contents
               DOI 10.17487/RFC7959, August 2016,
               <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7959>.
 
+   [RFC7967]  Bhattacharyya, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Pal, A., and T.
+              Bose, "Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Option for
+              No Server Response", RFC 7967, DOI 10.17487/RFC7967,
+              August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7967>.
+
    [RFC8075]  Castellani, A., Loreto, S., Rahman, A., Fossati, T., and
               E. Dijk, "Guidelines for Mapping Implementations: HTTP to
               the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 8075,
@@ -3059,11 +3064,6 @@ Table of Contents
               and Lossy Networks (MPL)", RFC 7731, DOI 10.17487/RFC7731,
               February 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7731>.
 
-   [RFC7967]  Bhattacharyya, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Pal, A., and T.
-              Bose, "Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Option for
-              No Server Response", RFC 7967, DOI 10.17487/RFC7967,
-              August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7967>.
-
    [RFC8323]  Bormann, C., Lemay, S., Tschofenig, H., Hartke, K.,
               Silverajan, B., and B. Raymor, Ed., "CoAP (Constrained
               Application Protocol) over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets",
@@ -3918,6 +3918,8 @@ Appendix E.  Document Updates
 
 E.1.  Version -11 to -12
 
+   *  Made RFC 7967 a normative reference.
+
    *  Generalized resending of a group request with different Message
       ID.