You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have noticed, while working with Reals that my Search queries are polluted by lemmas which (i think) were generated from an Add Field command.
These huge lemmas are
RField_field_lemma[1-4]
RField_ring_lemma[1-2]
RField_lemma5 (sic)
I don't think they can be of any use to a human (they are completely unreadable), so I think it would be better if they were blacklisted from Search results.
Here is what appears at the end of a Search Rplus inside RIneq. command output: Rfield_Search.txt
Coq Version
This is observed in upstream at this time (8.18+alpha) as well as in 8.16.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See also coq/coq#16327 which indicates maybe we could inline the lemmas where they're used instead of declaring them as constants (I didn't keep going because I didn't want to deal with the compat impact)
Description of the problem
I have noticed, while working with
Reals
that mySearch
queries are polluted by lemmas which (i think) were generated from anAdd Field
command.These huge lemmas are
RField_field_lemma[1-4]
RField_ring_lemma[1-2]
RField_lemma5
(sic)I don't think they can be of any use to a human (they are completely unreadable), so I think it would be better if they were blacklisted from Search results.
Here is what appears at the end of a
Search Rplus inside RIneq.
command output:Rfield_Search.txt
Coq Version
This is observed in upstream at this time (8.18+alpha) as well as in 8.16.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: