-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integration of preflyt for better checks #624
Comments
Unfortunately, it seems like preflyt hasn't been maintained for more than two years now. |
Closing as the project appears unmaintained now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It is great that we offer a lot of choice for components and I think we should make the template even more flexible (more on this soon); however the more components we offer, it creates a more complex decision tree of variable and configurations that have to be checked for a successful deployment.
For example, it could be a way to deal with #602
In order to test for and resolve this, I am proposing the integration of
preflyt
. It is a way to script checks for certain values (for example, environment variables are set, database is actually accessible, etc.) before an application is launched.This best makes sense for "local" deployments, as if you are deploying on Heroku then these configuration values are set by the respective addon in your environment.
I am not quite sure where best to integrate it; I don't think its wise to start messing with
manage.py
, but its not really a test per-se as it doesn't check your code, but rather your environment so I am not sure it belongs in the normal test suite.Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: