You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The release tarball from the Github release page does differ from the source.tar.gz provided by the Github Release Resource.
If the tarball is downloaded from the Github release page, the main directory inside of the tarball has the project name and the current version.
The source.tar.gz on the other side got the project name and part of a hash.
It would be great if either the github-release-resource source.tar.gz would have the same content as the official tarball from the Github page or there is an option get this behavior.
Especially for building packages and similar it would be helpful to have the version in the directory name, so no extra intelligence is needed to determine the first parts of some commit hash.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The actual file in our rpm tree comes from a Concourse pipeline which uses the github-release-resource to get the latest tarball.
But this tarball references a commit or tag and not the released version which results in different tarballs and checksums. The content should be the same but the directory name is not.
The release tarball from the Github release page does differ from the source.tar.gz provided by the Github Release Resource.
If the tarball is downloaded from the Github release page, the main directory inside of the tarball has the project name and the current version.
The source.tar.gz on the other side got the project name and part of a hash.
For example this tarball https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cli/archive/v6.32.0.tar.gz has the directory name
cli-6.32.0
and the one from the github resource with the same version and in theory content hascloudfoundry-cli-829c87e
.It would be great if either the github-release-resource
source.tar.gz
would have the same content as the official tarball from the Github page or there is an option get this behavior.Especially for building packages and similar it would be helpful to have the version in the directory name, so no extra intelligence is needed to determine the first parts of some commit hash.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: