-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review/triage existing GitHub issues (+ new labels) #229
Comments
Re: potential use of labels. here are some projects i've worked on or learned from, which might provide inspiration for our own patterns of label use (though not advocating prematurely adding a billion labels 🙂)
|
As I'm reviewing old issues, this here's a pending shortlist of candidates that might work for us:
|
Just finished reviewing all past issues (open & closed) 🎉 |
Added labels:
(Feedback or alt names welcome! Normally, I'd get prior feedback on changes to labels, but this one felt real safe.) |
Example: Labels with emoji! https://github.com/mergeability/mergeable/labels |
Added label for EDIT: Also, |
We've got a decent set of labels, and we've brought all issues into this repo -- I think we're good to close this for now, but poke me if you disagree :) |
Note, previously added labels for |
Re-ticketed from: https://github.com/pol-is/polis-issues/issues/128#issue-593756050
Reviewing all past issues seemed like it might be a good thing to do before proposing/tagging new labels, closing dups, merging, seeking more info, commenting, inviting contributions, etc.
Used
github-csv-tools
to export each queue to CSV, then dropped them all into a Google spreadsheet. The idea is to have a scratch space for myself or anyone else before creating a bunch of noise through commenting/closing/etc.GSheet: Polis: Issue export from Github repos (others pls feel welcome to work in this sheet too)
New issues (created after export) will show up here:
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Apol-is+created%3A%3E%3D2020-04-23&type=Issues
This is what I expect to have done to consider this issue closed
To Dos
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: