-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Java Virtual Threads (Loom) (500USD Bounty) #90
Comments
I can create a PR for this if this seems like a good idea to @lihaoyi |
Go for it, though note we'll need some compatibility story for Java <21 |
Is this something that #74 unblocks? |
I would recommend against this until JAVA-23 is released, du to the "pinning issue", effectively making Virtual Threads useless if your code/libs uses |
Doing it opt-in should be fine. We can run benchmarks etc. without synchronized to see the benefit. That way we can be ready on day one when Java 23 lands with a fix to the thread pinning issue. |
I have done this at $work for all my services, with Java 21, it works fine, no need to delay to Java 23. |
If there are issues because of undertow, you may consider switching to Helidon, which is the new web server from Oracle, built for working with virtual threads. https://github.com/helidon-io/helidon/tree/main/webserver https://central.sonatype.com/artifact/io.helidon.webserver/helidon-webserver/overview https://javadoc.io/doc/io.helidon.webserver/helidon-webserver/ |
FYI for anyone reading, this bounty is still open in case anyone else wants to take a crack at this |
@lihaoyi Since I started this issue, I am going to finish it too. :) |
while building cask, twirl throws java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException |
I get that too when building on JDK >= 21. Maybe the newer 2.0.x works better. |
Spawn a virtual thread for each incoming request, which would enable asynchronous behaviour and increase performance of the library. The new Java virtual threads are lightweight and can replace the traditional Java threads. Given that Cask does not have any strong async/concurrency model of its own, leveraging the new JVM feature would be really nice.
Haoyi: To incentivize contribution, I'm putting a 500USD bounty on resolving this ticket. This is payable via bank transfer, and at my discretion in case of ambiguity. The acceptance criteria is a PR implementing support for virtual threads, tests exercising them, and performance benchmarks (ad-hoc is OK) demonstrating a performance improvement (e.g. in high concurrency use cases) vs normal threads in Java 21+
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: