|
| 1 | +# Introduction |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +The main aim of this exercise is to understand how non-negative integers work in different bases. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Given that mathematical understanding, the code to implement it can be relatively simple. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +For this exercise, no attempt was made to benchmark performance, as this would distract from the main focus of writing clear, correct code. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## General guidance |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Essentially all succesful solutions involve three steps: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +1. Check that inputs are valid. |
| 14 | +2. Convert the input list to a Python `int`. |
| 15 | +3. Convert that `int` to an output list in the new base. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Some programmers prefer to separate the two conversions into separate functions, others put everything in a single function. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +This is largely a matter of taste, and either structure can be made reasonably concise and readable. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +## 1. Check the inputs |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +```python |
| 24 | + if input_base < 2: |
| 25 | + raise ValueError("input base must be >= 2") |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | + if not all( 0 <= digit < input_base for digit in digits) : |
| 28 | + raise ValueError("all digits must satisfy 0 <= d < input base") |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | + if not output_base >= 2: |
| 31 | + raise ValueError("output base must be >= 2") |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +``` |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +A valid number base must be `>=2` and all digits must be at least zero and strictly less than the number base. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +For the familiar base-10 system, this means 0 to 9. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +As implemented, the tests require that invalid input raise a `ValueError` with a suitable error message. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +## 2. Convert the input digits to an `int` |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +These four code fragments all do essentially the same thing: |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +```python |
| 46 | +# Simplest loop |
| 47 | + val = 0 |
| 48 | + for digit in digits: |
| 49 | + val = input_base * val + digit |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +# Loop, separating the arithmetic steps |
| 52 | + val = 0 |
| 53 | + for digit in digits: |
| 54 | + val *= input_base |
| 55 | + val += digit |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +# Sum a comprehension over reversed digits |
| 58 | + val = sum(digit * input_base ** pos for pos, digit in enumerate(reversed(digits))) |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +# Sum a comprehension with alternative reversing |
| 61 | + val = sum((digit * (input_base ** (len(digits) - 1 - i)) for i, digit in enumerate(digits))) |
| 62 | +``` |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +In the first two, the `val *= input_base` step essentially left-shifts all the previous digits, and `val += digit` adds a new digit on the right. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +In the two comprehensions, an exponentation like `input_base ** pos` left-shifts the current digit to the appropriate position in the output. |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +*Please think about this until it makes sense:* these short code fragments are the main point of the exercise. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +In each code fragment, the Python `int` is called `val`, a deliberately neutral identifier. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Surprisingly many students use names like `decimal` or `base10` for the intermediate value, which is misleading. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +A Python `int` is an object with a complicated (but largely hidden) implementation. |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +There are methods to convert an `int` to string representations such as decimal, binary or hexadecimal, but the internal representation of `int` is certainly not decimal. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +## 3. Convert the intermediate `int` to output digits |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +Now we have to reverse step 2, with a different base. |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +```python |
| 83 | + out = [] |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +# Step forward, insert new digits at beginning |
| 86 | + while val > 0: |
| 87 | + out.insert(0, val % output_base) |
| 88 | + val = val // output_base |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +# Insert at end, then reverse |
| 91 | + while val: |
| 92 | + out.append(val % output_base) |
| 93 | + val //= output_base |
| 94 | + out.reverse() |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +# Use divmod() |
| 97 | + while val: |
| 98 | + div, mod = divmod(val, output_base) |
| 99 | + out.append(mod) |
| 100 | + val = div |
| 101 | + out.reverse() |
| 102 | +``` |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +Again, there are multiple code snippets shown above, which all do the same thing. |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +In each case, we essentially need the value and remainder of an integer division. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +The first snippet above adds new digits at the start of the list, while the next two add at the end. |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +This is a choice of where to take the performance hit: appending to the end is a faster way to grow the list, but needs an extra reverse step. |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +The choice of append-reverse would be obvious in Lisp or SML, but the difference is less important in Python. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +```python |
| 115 | +# return, with guard for empty list |
| 116 | + return out or [0] |
| 117 | +``` |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +Finally, we return the digits just calculated. |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +A minor complcation is that a zero value should be `[0]`, not `[]`. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +Here, we cover this case in the `return` statement, but it could also have been trapped at the beginning of the program, with an early `return`. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +## Recursion option |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +```python |
| 128 | +def base2dec(input_base: int, digits: list[int]) -> int: |
| 129 | + if not digits: |
| 130 | + return 0 |
| 131 | + return input_base * base2dec(input_base, digits[:-1]) + digits[-1] |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +def dec2base(number: int, output_base: int) -> list[int]: |
| 135 | + if not number: |
| 136 | + return [] |
| 137 | + return [number % output_base] + dec2base(number // output_base, output_base) |
| 138 | +``` |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +An unusual solution to the two conversions is shown above. |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +It works, and the problem is small enough to avoid stack overflow (Python has no tail recursion). |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +In practice, few Python programmers would take this approach in a language without the appropriate performance optimizations. |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +To simplify: Python only *allows* recursion, it does nothing to *encourage* it: in contrast to Scala, Elixir, and similar languages. |
| 147 | + |
0 commit comments