You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 8, 2022. It is now read-only.
Based on the following comment from [0] and the "obsolescence" of the GG20 paper I think it would make sense to "deprecate" the tecdsa/gg20 package so that any new implementations or those which already rely on this code are aware of the risks of this protocol.
On the other hand, the authors of that paper appear to have declared it "obsolete". In light of this declaration, we cannot attest,
given the information we currently have, that the protocol implemented here is secure. We advise caution regarding its use.
I cannot, per [0] these changes would need to occur at the algorithm design level and are not related to implementation.
^
On the other hand, the authors of that paper appear to have declared it "obsolete". In light of this declaration, we cannot attest, given the information we currently have, that the protocol implemented here is secure. We advise caution regarding its use.
Based on the following comment from [0] and the "obsolescence" of the GG20 paper I think it would make sense to "deprecate" the
tecdsa/gg20
package so that any new implementations or those which already rely on this code are aware of the risks of this protocol.This should be possible via the following godoc declaration: https://rakyll.org/deprecated/
[0] https://github.com/coinbase/kryptology/blob/master/pkg/tecdsa/gg20/SECURITY.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: