Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #515 [1716542523099] #576

Closed
c4-judge opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #515 [1716542523099] #576

c4-judge opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-569 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

Judge has assessed an item in Issue #515 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows:

[L-02] WithdrawQueue is pausable but pausing it has no effect
@c4-judge c4-judge added the 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value label May 24, 2024
c4-judge added a commit that referenced this issue May 24, 2024
@c4-judge
LessDupes issue #576 (File generated from upgraded finding by judge a…
beb9a09 
…lcueca)
@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label May 24, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

alcueca marked the issue as satisfactory

@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor Author

alcueca marked the issue as duplicate of #569

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value duplicate-569 satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@c4-judge