You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Governance model is the same since I've joined the project.
I believe there has been some changes for the vendor seat cap when Knative joined CNCF, but not sure how relevant it is right now.
There were some WGs that were created and then closed.
The Trademark committee has been dissolved recently. It was created to handle the trademark issues before Knative joined CNCF.
Any specific aspects of your governance structure are you seeking feedback on?
Nothing specific.
Do you have any concerns or specific areas where you feel your governance could be improved?
I personally believe there are a few major things right now:
The Docs WG has been closed, but there is no overarching entity that takes care of the docs. This will be an issue soon.
Maintainer list needs to have employer affiliation.
Some governance docs are outdated (can't give an exact list, but I sometimes see outdated content).
Community calendar has some outdated entries (e.g closed Docs WG meeting)
Meetings are not recorded anymore (or they're not uploaded)
Inactive approvers / WG leads / committee members are not removed. They're kept in the owner files forever.
Not really about governance improvements, but there are a few issues in the community health. We need some governance improvements too, to address these problems:
Red Hat dominance
Not collaborating with CNCF TAGs (App Delivery etc.)
Project Name
Knative
Project Website
https://knative.dev/
Contact Details 1
@aliok
Contact Details 2
@nainaz
Links to communication channels
https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C04LGHDR9K7
Reason for governance review request
Application for moving levels from Incubation to Graduation
Are there any sub-projects, plugins, and related?
Knative has 4 modules:
Governance model
Knative governance is based on the "The Steering Committee" governance model: https://contribute.cncf.io/maintainers/templates/governance-elections/
Governance documents
Project purpose (partial):
Maintainer list: (No employer affiliation exist in these files)
How your project is making decisions:
How and when contributors are moving through the contributor ladder (e.g. becoming a maintainer)
Maintainer life cycle with information about how and when maintainers are demoted
Code of Conduct:
Contributor Guide:
How your community conduct communication and meetings:
How your community handles security reporting and response:
Who owns what code and docs:
knative/community
repository is owned by the steering committee: https://github.com/knative/community/blob/7e7b3c26cee0986ef70c46004af3b877c0afb14c/OWNERS#L4Additional:
Governance Execution Examples
Election examples:
Voting example (decision making):
Promoting a contributor:
Demoting a maintainer:
Security response:
Meeting recordings:
Governance Evolution
Governance model is the same since I've joined the project.
I believe there has been some changes for the vendor seat cap when Knative joined CNCF, but not sure how relevant it is right now.
There were some WGs that were created and then closed.
The Trademark committee has been dissolved recently. It was created to handle the trademark issues before Knative joined CNCF.
Any specific aspects of your governance structure are you seeking feedback on?
Nothing specific.
Do you have any concerns or specific areas where you feel your governance could be improved?
I personally believe there are a few major things right now:
Not really about governance improvements, but there are a few issues in the community health. We need some governance improvements too, to address these problems:
Additional notes and resources
There's also these web pages:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: