Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DynVarMIP: variable priority levels mismatch #89

Open
edwinpgerber opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

DynVarMIP: variable priority levels mismatch #89

edwinpgerber opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@edwinpgerber
Copy link

It was brought to our attention that there is a mismatch between the priority levels of variables in the CMIP6 data request as compared to the GMD paper which outlines the DynVarMIP (http://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3413-2016).

  1. A few variables are listed as priority 2 in the CMIP6 data request (DR), but were listed as priority 1 in the GMD paper. These will be missed if groups only do priority 1 variables. The variables are:
  • vtendnogw and vtendogw (DR: Emon table, GMD paper: table 3)
  • tntrl+tntrs (DR: EmonZ table, GMD paper: table 5)
  1. Conversely, the following variables are listed as priority 1 in the DR, but are listed as priority 2 in the GMD paper. (We would very much like to have these variables, but felt that we should note that mismatch. In particular, mnstrage (mean stratospheric age) may not be included in many models.)
  • psitem+mnstrage (GMD: table 2, DR: EdayZ, AERmonZ)
  • tauupbl+tauvpbl (GMD: table 4, DR: Eday)
  • tntrlcs+tntrscs+tntc+tntscp (GMD: table 5, DR: EmonZ)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant