From 889650b1550c4611c1649a3d67521a5fdaa18f03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivo Gosemann <ivo.gosemann@sap.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 17:23:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] docs: add initial draft from workshop discussion

---
 architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding | 0
 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding

diff --git a/architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding b/architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29

From c01a1e393b685794a96413a2af2bd7becb579482 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abhijith Ravindra <abhijith.ravindra@sap.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:04:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] chore: update ADR with tooling

---
 .../007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding         |  0
 .../008-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding.md      | 83 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
 delete mode 100644 architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding
 create mode 100644 architecture-decision-records/008-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding.md

diff --git a/architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding b/architecture-decision-records/007-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding
deleted file mode 100644
index e69de29..0000000
diff --git a/architecture-decision-records/008-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding.md b/architecture-decision-records/008-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d8582b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/architecture-decision-records/008-greenhouse-cluster-onboarding.md
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+# 008 Cluster Onboarding
+
+- Status: [draft | proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [xxx](yyyymmdd-xxx.md)] <!-- optional -->
+- Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
+- Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional. To customize the ordering without relying on Git creation dates and filenames -->
+- Tags: [greenhouse / cloudoperators] <!-- optional -->
+- Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->
+
+## Context and Problem Statement
+
+[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]
+
+## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->
+
+- [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
+- [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
+- … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->
+
+## Considered Options
+
+- [option 1]
+- [option 2]
+- [option 3]
+- … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->
+
+## Decision Outcome
+
+Chosen option: "[option 1]",
+because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].
+
+### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->
+
+- [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
+- …
+
+### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->
+
+- [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
+- …
+
+## Pros and Cons of the Options | Evaluation of options <!-- optional -->
+
+### [option 1]
+
+[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
+
+| Decision Driver     | Rating | Reason                        |
+|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
+| [decision driver a] | +++    | Good, because [argument a]    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 
+| [decision driver b] | ---    | Good, because [argument b]    |
+| [decision driver c] | --     | Bad, because [argument c]     |
+| [decision driver d] | o      | Neutral, because [argument d] |
+
+### [option 2]
+
+[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
+
+| Decision Driver     | Rating | Reason                        |
+|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
+| [decision driver a] | +++    | Good, because [argument a]    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 
+| [decision driver b] | ---    | Good, because [argument b]    |
+| [decision driver c] | --     | Bad, because [argument c]     |
+| [decision driver d] | o      | Neutral, because [argument d] |
+
+### [option 3]
+
+[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->
+
+| Decision Driver     | Rating | Reason                        |
+|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
+| [decision driver a] | +++    | Good, because [argument a]    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 
+| [decision driver b] | ---    | Good, because [argument b]    |
+| [decision driver c] | --     | Bad, because [argument c]     |
+| [decision driver d] | o      | Neutral, because [argument d] |
+
+## Related Decision Records <!-- optional -->
+
+[previous decision record, e.g., an ADR, which is solved by this one | next decision record, e.g., an ADR, which solves this one | … | pointer to more information]
+
+## Links <!-- optional -->
+
+- [Link type](link to adr) <!-- example: Refined by [xxx](yyyymmdd-xxx.md) -->
+- … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->