-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Help with design low-level HDL language #417
Comments
Note that after the discussion in this bug and other issues most of the people agreed to push forward the FIRRTL. Please give the feedback on this if you have any. |
It's very unclear whether FIRRTL has asynchronous resets, so I don't know whether it can be a target. |
@christiaanb just an update, FIRRTL got an asynchronous reset, and they will be the part of the upcoming 1.2.0 release: https://github.com/freechipsproject/firrtl/issues/1196 |
@XVilka Thanks for the update, I'll check it out |
If you ever plan to add support for it, you could also check out the LLVM-based CIRCT implementation of FIRRTL as a dialect. |
FPGA world suffers a lot from fragmentation - some tools produce Verilog, some VHDL, some - only subsets of them, creating low-level LLVM-like alternative will help everyone, so HDL implementations will opt only for generating this low-level HDL and routing/synthesizers accept it. LLVM or WebAssembly - you can see how many languages and targets are supported now by both. With more open source tools for FPGA this is more feasible now than ever.
See f4pga/ideas#19
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: