Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better explanation of validation #10

Open
TomazErjavec opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Better explanation of validation #10

TomazErjavec opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@TomazErjavec
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TomazErjavec
Copy link
Collaborator

In the Wiki, it is baldly stated that one should use xmllint (also for XInclude expansion). However, xmllint (at least old versions?) has a bug that when the document becomes too big, it starts spewing out errors "validity error : ID ... already defined" for all defined xml:ids, even though they are correctly defined only once.

This needs to be investigated and alternative solutions to validation of large corpora found.
@TomazErjavec TomazErjavec added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 22, 2020
@TomazErjavec TomazErjavec self-assigned this Sep 22, 2020
@TomazErjavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This docu should also give a pointer to https://github.com/projectEndings/diagnostics and maybe to my own (enhanced) check-links.xsl (which should become part of this git project).

@matyaskopp
Copy link
Contributor

related issue: clarin-eric/ParlaMint#137

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@TomazErjavec TomazErjavec

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@matyaskopp @TomazErjavec