Ease of Movement Strategy is added. #241
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #241 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.41% 93.51% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 171 172 +1
Lines 5997 6074 +77
==========================================
+ Hits 5602 5680 +78
Misses 335 335
+ Partials 60 59 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
strategy/volume/ease_of_movement_strategy_test.go (2)
17-37: LGTM: TestEaseOfMovementStrategy is well-structured.The test function is well-implemented, following good practices for Go unit tests. It correctly reads test data, initializes the strategy, computes results, and compares them with expected values.
Consider adding a descriptive error message to the
t.Fatal(err)calls to provide more context in case of test failures. For example:if err != nil { - t.Fatal(err) + t.Fatalf("Failed to read snapshots from CSV: %v", err) }
39-55: LGTM: TestEaseOfMovementStrategyReport is well-implemented.The test function for report generation is well-structured and follows good practices. It correctly reads test data, generates a report, and handles file operations appropriately.
Consider enhancing the test by verifying the contents of the generated HTML file before removing it. This could involve checking for expected HTML elements or specific content. Here's a potential improvement:
err = report.WriteToFile(fileName) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to write report to file: %v", err) } // Read the generated file content, err := os.ReadFile(fileName) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to read generated report: %v", err) } // Check for expected content (adjust based on your report structure) if !strings.Contains(string(content), "<title>Ease of Movement Strategy Report</title>") { t.Error("Generated report does not contain expected title") }This addition would provide more confidence in the correctness of the generated report.
README.md (1)
141-141: Fix indentation: Replace hard tab with spaces.The indentation on this line uses a hard tab, which is inconsistent with the rest of the file that uses spaces for indentation. To maintain consistency, please replace the hard tab with spaces.
Apply this change:
-- [Ease of Movement Strategy](strategy/volume/README.md#type-easeofmovementstrategy) +- [Ease of Movement Strategy](strategy/volume/README.md#type-easeofmovementstrategy)Ensure that the indentation aligns with the other items in the list.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
141-141: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
strategy/volume/README.md (1)
168-176: Consider adding an article for clarity.The comment for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy function is missing an article before "new Ease of Movement strategy". Consider adding "a" for improved readability.
Suggested change:
- NewEaseOfMovementStrategy function initializes a new Ease of Movement strategy instance with the default parameters. + NewEaseOfMovementStrategy function initializes a new Ease of Movement strategy instance with the default parameters.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~174-~174: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...Strategy() *EaseOfMovementStrategy ``` NewEaseOfMovementStrategy function initializes a new Ease of Move...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
strategy/volume/ease_of_movement_strategy.go (2)
16-21: Add parameter validation for EaseOfMovementStrategyCurrently, there is no validation on the
periodparameter when initializing the strategy. Consider adding validation to ensure that the period is a positive integer to prevent potential runtime errors.Apply this diff to add parameter validation:
func NewEaseOfMovementStrategyWith(period int) *EaseOfMovementStrategy { + if period <= 0 { + panic("Period must be a positive integer") + } return &EaseOfMovementStrategy{ EaseOfMovement: volume.NewEmvWithPeriod[float64](period), } }
31-37: Simplify constructor documentationThe comments for
NewEaseOfMovementStrategyWithcan be simplified for clarity.Update the comments as follows:
-// NewEaseOfMovementStrategyWith function initializes a new Ease of Movement strategy instance with the -// given parameters. +// NewEaseOfMovementStrategyWith initializes a new Ease of Movement strategy with the specified period.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
strategy/volume/testdata/ease_of_movement_strategy.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- strategy/volume/README.md (2 hunks)
- strategy/volume/ease_of_movement_strategy.go (1 hunks)
- strategy/volume/ease_of_movement_strategy_test.go (1 hunks)
- strategy/volume/volume.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
141-141: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🪛 LanguageTool
strategy/volume/README.md
[uncategorized] ~174-~174: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...Strategy() *EaseOfMovementStrategy ``` NewEaseOfMovementStrategy function initializes a new Ease of Move...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
strategy/volume/volume.go (1)
29-29: LGTM! Verify related components.The addition of
NewEaseOfMovementStrategy()to theAllStrategies()function is correct and consistent with the existing code structure.To ensure completeness, please verify the following:
- The implementation of
NewEaseOfMovementStrategy()exists and is correct.- Any relevant documentation has been updated to include this new strategy.
- Appropriate unit tests have been added or updated for this change.
Run the following script to verify the implementation and tests:
✅ Verification successful
Verified Successfully!
All checks for
NewEaseOfMovementStrategyhave passed:
- Implementation exists in
ease_of_movement_strategy.goand is documented inREADME.md.- Relevant tests are present in
ease_of_movement_strategy_test.go.- Documentation comments referencing
NewEaseOfMovementStrategyare in place.No further actions are required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and tests for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy # Test 1: Check if NewEaseOfMovementStrategy is implemented echo "Checking for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy implementation:" rg -p "func NewEaseOfMovementStrategy\(\)" strategy/volume/ # Test 2: Check if there are tests for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy echo "Checking for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy tests:" rg -p "func Test.*EaseOfMovement" strategy/volume/ # Test 3: Check if NewEaseOfMovementStrategy is documented echo "Checking for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy documentation:" rg -p "NewEaseOfMovementStrategy" strategy/volume/ | rg "\/\/"Length of output: 938
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the documentation for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy echo "Checking for NewEaseOfMovementStrategy documentation:" rg -p "NewEaseOfMovementStrategy" strategy/volume/ | rg "//"Length of output: 669
strategy/volume/ease_of_movement_strategy_test.go (2)
1-15: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are well-structured and follow Go conventions. The necessary packages for testing, file operations, and the custom indicator packages are correctly imported.
1-55: Overall, the test file is well-implemented and effectively tests the EaseOfMovementStrategy.The test functions are structured correctly, handle errors appropriately, and cover both the computation and reporting aspects of the strategy. The use of CSV files for test data and the implementation of helper functions contribute to the test's readability and maintainability.
While the current implementation is solid, consider the suggested minor improvements to enhance error reporting and test coverage. These changes would further increase the robustness of the tests.
README.md (1)
141-141: LGTM: Ease of Movement Strategy added successfully.The Ease of Movement Strategy has been correctly added to the list of Volume Strategies, which aligns with the PR objectives. The link format is consistent with other strategy links in the list.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
141-141: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
strategy/volume/README.md (7)
35-40: LGTM: New strategy properly integrated into the index.The EaseOfMovementStrategy has been correctly added to the index section of the README. It follows the same format and structure as the other strategies listed.
156-166: LGTM: EaseOfMovementStrategy type definition is well-documented.The type definition for EaseOfMovementStrategy is clear and follows the same structure as other strategies in the package. The comment explaining the strategy's recommendation logic is helpful for users.
177-184: LGTM: NewEaseOfMovementStrategyWith function is well-documented.The NewEaseOfMovementStrategyWith function is properly documented and follows the same structure as other similar functions in the package.
186-193: LGTM: Compute method is correctly documented.The Compute method for EaseOfMovementStrategy is well-documented and consistent with other strategies in the package.
195-202: LGTM: Name method is properly documented.The Name method for EaseOfMovementStrategy is correctly documented and follows the same pattern as other strategies.
204-211: LGTM: Report method is well-documented.The Report method for EaseOfMovementStrategy is properly documented and consistent with other strategies in the package.
Line range hint
35-212: Overall, the EaseOfMovementStrategy is well-integrated and documented.The new EaseOfMovementStrategy has been successfully added to the volume package documentation. It follows the existing structure and format, maintaining consistency with other strategies. The documentation is clear and informative, providing users with a good understanding of the strategy's purpose and functionality.
There's only one minor grammatical suggestion to improve readability, but overall, the changes are well-implemented and maintain the high quality of the existing documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~174-~174: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...Strategy() *EaseOfMovementStrategy ``` NewEaseOfMovementStrategy function initializes a new Ease of Move...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
strategy/volume/ease_of_movement_strategy.go (1)
105-107: Ensure consistency in outcome scalingThe outcomes are multiplied by 100 on line 106. Verify that this scaling aligns with how outcomes are represented elsewhere in the codebase to maintain consistency.
Run the following script to check for consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Outcome scaling by 100 is consistent across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for other instances where outcomes are multiplied by 100 to ensure consistent scaling. # Test: Find all lines multiplying outcomes by 100. rg 'outcomes\s*=\s*helper\.MultiplyBy\(outcomes,\s*100\)'Length of output: 2839
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
145-145: Minor: Replace hard tab with spaces for consistency.There's a hard tab at the beginning of this line. For consistency with the rest of the document, consider replacing it with spaces.
Apply this change:
-- [Ease of Movement Strategy](strategy/volume/README.md#type-easeofmovementstrategy) +- [Ease of Movement Strategy](strategy/volume/README.md#type-easeofmovementstrategy)🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
145-145: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
145-145: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
145-145: LGTM: New strategy added successfully.The addition of the Ease of Movement Strategy to the list of Volume Strategies is consistent with the PR objectives and follows the existing format.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
145-145: Column: 2
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
Describe Request
Ease of Movement Strategy is added.
Change Type
New strategy.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
EaseOfMovementStrategy, providing buy and sell recommendations based on market data.Documentation
README.mdto clarify installation, usage, contributing guidelines, and licensing information.