Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unsatisfied reconstructed results for images in-the-wild #17

Open
zhanghm1995 opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Unsatisfied reconstructed results for images in-the-wild #17

zhanghm1995 opened this issue Apr 21, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@zhanghm1995
Copy link

Hi, thank your for sharing this amazing work.

When I ran the demo inference for the in-the-wild images, I got results they are not good.

The input image:
image

The landmark image:
image

The blended image:
image

You can easily find the results have misalignment, I am not sure whether I did something wrong.

BTW, the image size is 512x512.

@choyingw
Copy link
Owner

image resolution and bbox cropping may affect the performance. You can try to tune the detected bbox size (increase or reduce the size a little bit) for the best performance.

@zhanghm1995
Copy link
Author

zhanghm1995 commented Apr 22, 2022

@choyingw Thank you for your reply. I want to know how to tune the detected bbox size with a little bit? BTW, the I found the image resolution of your sample images is also high, but the performance of yours seems better.

@rlczddl
Copy link

rlczddl commented Oct 13, 2022

I encountered the same problem, how to adjust?

@zhanghm1995
Copy link
Author

@rlczddl Sadly to say, I cannot solve this problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants