Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Several Ways to call a function #28

Open
cheatsheet1999 opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Several Ways to call a function #28

cheatsheet1999 opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@cheatsheet1999
Copy link
Owner

cheatsheet1999 commented Sep 10, 2021

1. Regular function

this is pointing to Window

function fn() {
    console.log('This is a function');
}

function fn() {
    console.log('This is a function' + this);
}

fn();
fn.call();

2. Method on objects

this is pointing to object => o

because o called sayHI method

let o = {
    sayHi: function() {
       console.log('This is a function');
    }
}

o.sayHi();

3. Constructor

this is pointing to rick because rick instantiate the constructor

this in the prototype object is also pointing to rick

function fn() {}
new fn();

let rick = new fn();
fn.prototype.start = function(){};

4. Register Event function

this in register event function is pointing to the attached element, but in this example

let btn = document.querySelector('button');
btn.onclick = function() {
	console.log(this)
}; //click the button to call the function

5. Timer function

this is pointing to Window

setInterval(function() {}, 1000); //execute function in every second

6. IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression)

this is pointing to Window

(function() {
  console.log('This is a function')
})();

Understanding of 'this' keyword

Scenario 1: 'this' in global environment

It is relatively straightforward in this scenario, the browser in the global environment invokes the function. 'this' is pointing to ** Window**. However, 'this' will point to undefined if 'use strict'.

function f1 () {
    console.log(this)
}
function f2 () {
    'use strict'
    console.log(this)
}
f1() // window
f2() // undefined

There is a very similar question (tedious, useless, but interesting)

const foo = {
    bar: 10,
    fn: function() {
       console.log(this)
       console.log(this.bar)
    }
}
var fn1 = foo.fn
fn1()

Output:

window
undefined
  • this is still pointing to the Window. Although function fn is invoked by the object foo (foo.fn), after assignment to fn1, there is a (). That means we execute fn1 in the global environment. Therefore, the code above still outputs window and undefined.

Now, if we change to

const foo = {
    bar: 10,
    fn: function() {
       console.log(this)
       console.log(this.bar)
    }
}
foo.fn() 

Output

{bar: 10, fn: ƒ}
10
  • this is pointing to the object that invokes the function. Whenever a preceding dot calls a function, the object before that dot is this.
  • To be more clear, in foo.fn(), this is pointing to foo. When executing function, if this in the function is invoked by parent scope, then this will point to parent scope environment, otherwise, this point to global environment

Scenario 2: 'this' in the context environment

Let's dive into examples.

const person = {
    name: 'Lucas',
    brother: {
        name: 'Mike',
        fn: function() {
            return this.name
        }
    }
}
console.log(person.brother.fn())
Mike

Why? Because in these nested relationships, this will point to the LAST object that invokes the function. Here is the brother scope, so we choose the name variable that is in brother scope.

Example 2:

const o1 = {
    text: 'o1',
    fn: function() {
        return this.text
    }
}
const o2 = {
    text: 'o2',
    fn: function() {
        return o1.fn()
    }
}
const o3 = {
    text: 'o3',
    fn: function() {
        var fn = o1.fn
        return fn()
    }
}

console.log(o1.fn())
console.log(o2.fn())
console.log(o3.fn())
o1
o1
undefined

WHAT???
Let's dive into it:

  • First, we got o1 because of o1.fn(), o1 called fn() so this.text will print the variable that is inside o1 object.
  • Second, although it is the o2 that invoked fn(), inside the function of o2, it is o1.fn(). Surprisingly, we jump to o1 and get o1 as its input
  • Last, after the var fn is assigned, it is a normal fn() call, so here this points to the Window, and the answer is, of course, undefined.

A follow-up question, if we want o2 as output for
console.log(o2.fn())
without using call, apply, bind
What should we do?

const o1 = {
    text: 'o1',
    fn: function() {
        return this.text
    }
}
const o2 = {
    text: 'o2',
    fn: o1.fn
}

console.log(o2.fn())

We don't execute o1.fn, instead, we only need the this.text inside o1.fn function. So in o2, we put this.text on o2.fn. Then execute it in the console.log(o2.fn())

Scenario 3: bind / call / apply

const foo = {
    name: 'lucas',
    logName: function() {
        console.log(this.name)
    }
}
const bar = {
    name: 'mike'
}
console.log(foo.logName.call(bar))

The above code will output mike

Scenario 4: this and constructor

function Foo() {
    this.bar = "Lucas"
}
const instance = new Foo()
console.log(instance.bar)

The output will be Lucas, but what happens behind the scene after new with constructor Foo?

  • Create a new Object
  • this in constructor will point to the new object
  • Adding attributes, methods for the object
  • return a new object

The above can be shown as code below

let obj  = {}
obj.__proto__ = Foo.prototype
Foo.call(obj)

Here, we only simulate a naive version of new

Note, if return has been mentioned in a constructor, there are two cases needed to be considered

First

function Foo(){
    this.user = "Lucas"
    const o = {}
    return o
}
const instance = new Foo()
console.log(instance.user)

It will output undefined because instance is an empty object o just returned

Second

function Foo(){
    this.user = "Lucas"
    return 1
}
const instance = new Foo()
console.log(instance.user)

It will output Lucas, which means instance is the object instantiating this

Conclusion: If a value is explicitly returned in the constructor and an object is returned, then this points to the returned object; if the returned object is not an object, then this still points to the instance.

1. During function precompilation, `this` points to `window`    
2. In the global scope, `this` points to `window`   
3. call/apply can change `this` pointing    
4. obj.fn() who calls the method `this` points to whom    

Scenario 5: New story, this in the arrow function

this for arrow functions does not apply to the above standard rules, but is determined according to the outer (function or global) context scope.

const foo = {  
    fn: function () {  
        setTimeout(function() {  
            console.log(this)
        })
    }  
}  
console.log(foo.fn())

In this question, this is in an anonymous function of setTimeout(), so this is pointing to window object. However, we can use arrow functions to make this points to object foo

const foo = {  
    fn: function () {  
        setTimeout(() => {  
            console.log(this)
        })
    }  
} 
console.log(foo.fn())

Scenario 6: Prority of this

We often call the binding of this through call, apply, bind, and new as explicit binding; the pointing of this determined according to the call relationship is called implicit binding.
But which one has a higher priority?

function foo (a) {
    console.log(this.a)
}

const obj1 = {
    a: 1,
    foo: foo
}

const obj2 = {
    a: 2,
    foo: foo
}

obj1.foo.call(obj2)
obj2.foo.call(obj1)

Without call function, the output will be 1 and 2.
Now the output is 2 and 1
which means call, apply has a higher priority.

function foo (a) {
    this.a = a
}

const obj1 = {}

var bar = foo.bind(obj1)
bar(2)
console.log(obj1.a)

By using bind, this in bar has been binded on obj1. After executing bar(2), obj1.a = 2. Which is, after bar(2), obj1 is `{a: 2}

Turn to arrow function

function foo() {
    return a => {
        console.log(this.a)
    };
}

const obj1 = {
    a: 2
}

const obj2 = {
    a: 3
}

const bar = foo.call(obj1)
console.log(bar.call(obj2))

The output will be 2. We first bind this in foo() on obj1. The this of bar (reference arrow function) will also be bound to obj1, and the arrow function binding cannot be modified. Note here, foo() is not an arrow function, that's why we can use call function on foo.

If we refactor foo to arrow function completely

var a = 123
const foo = () => a => {
    console.log(this.a)
}

const obj1 = {
    a: 2
}

const obj2 = {
    a: 3
}

var bar = foo.call(obj1)
console.log(bar.call(obj2))

It will output 123.

Reference

https://www.zhihu.com/question/353757734/answer/964557747
https://blog.kevinchisholm.com/javascript/context-object-literals/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant