Standard Structure for README.md in each WG repo

[yash-yp]

Hi everyone,

While standardizing the repositories, I noticed that the README file of each working group has a different structure. After discussing with @GeorgLink, I have drafted a proposal for a common structure that can be implemented across these README files. I have also replicated the same as a template.

Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pfipIiaemdtdiDQpvY7jOKhKzsv_3lXLLsbJiByl5GU/edit?usp=sharing

Please provide your thoughts and suggestions regarding the proposal.

[GeorgLink]

@yash2002109 , can you please take a look at the repo and let us know here if there is anything still missing before we can close this issue?

[yash-yp]

Thanks, @GeorgLink,

In discussion with WGs, we decided to remove the meeting details from the README and redirect the user to the Participate section on the website. We also discussed with the community to add the Chairs instead of WG-maintainers.

Also, please refer to the template: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pfipIiaemdtdiDQpvY7jOKhKzsv_3lXLLsbJiByl5GU/edit
to make sure the order in which the information is presented gets followed.

The Common WG README can be used as a reference.

It would be great if a WG member could take an AI to draft the README.

[GeorgLink]

Thanks @yash2002109 , we'll leave this issue open for the WG to address in their own time 👍