-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upscale performance feels really slow? #3024
Comments
try using a small-ish custom tile size when upscaling and see if that helps. the auto mode might be estimating a tile size that is slightly too large |
Thanks for the reply. I tested different Tile Sizes and seems like Auto is estimating just fine, it did not jump into "not enough VRAM" territory. Here are the values just in case: Size / Time Guess everything works the way it is supposed to, it's just the user being impatient, heh. Well, just wanted to make sure everything is being done correctly on this end and looks like it is. |
You're doing this via the pytorch nodes, right? |
That's a really large model you're running on a very large image. It's going to be slow no matter what |
I see. Guess upscayl is just doing something differently (sneakily using smaller models or such) and has spoiled my expectations. Thank you for your patience. Btw, would it be hard to add an option for something like a little beep (or just regular OS notification noise, whatever it may be) when a chain finishes? |
Since you seem to be on Windows, you should be able to use task manager' performance tab to verify your GPU is being used as expected. It probably is, but it can't hurt to check. You should see the usage show up on the Cuda graph |
I haven't used Upscayl before, but from glancing at its documentation, it looks like it's using ncnn rather than PyTorch. Can you compare the performance of chaiNNer's ncnn nodes with Upscayl, for a more apples-to-apples comparison? |
Hello!
This app is amazing, but I just want to make sure something isn't being done incorrectly on my part.
Basically using it with the upscale functions (but mostly with x1 models to improve image quality) seems to take quite a while, several minutes most of the time. Meanwhile something like upscayl appears to blast through similar tasks within seconds. Obviously models can differ, but still such a massive difference makes one think.
Here's system information from the app:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: