Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Organizing the GitHub repository #28

Closed
17 of 25 tasks
m-mohr opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 8 comments · Fixed by #32, #33, #35, #36 or #37
Closed
17 of 25 tasks

Organizing the GitHub repository #28

m-mohr opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 8 comments · Fixed by #32, #33, #35, #36 or #37
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

m-mohr commented Jun 7, 2024

As partially discussed during the last meeting, here are some proposals how we could improve this repository:

Happy to help to set this up if people are happy with the proposals.

@m-mohr m-mohr self-assigned this Jun 7, 2024
@avalentino
Copy link

I would be happy to help too.

@akerosenqvist
Copy link
Collaborator

Not knowing much about GitHub but your suggestions above seem to make sense (as does #29)

@libbyrose
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks Matthias. Happy for you to re-organise as helpful to the team - let me know if there are specific items I can help with.

@m-mohr m-mohr added the Chore label Jun 12, 2024
@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-mohr commented Jun 12, 2024

@avalentino I've completed all the basic tasks, but feel free to take over any of the CI related work.

@m-mohr m-mohr linked a pull request Jun 21, 2024 that will close this issue
@m-mohr m-mohr removed a link to a pull request Jun 21, 2024
This was linked to pull requests Jun 21, 2024
@m-mohr m-mohr reopened this Jun 25, 2024
@libbyrose
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry - appears when I merged it closed this!

@libbyrose libbyrose reopened this Jun 25, 2024
@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-mohr commented Jun 25, 2024

No worries, not your fault. It's a GitHub thing ;-)

@m-mohr m-mohr linked a pull request Jun 25, 2024 that will close this issue
@libbyrose libbyrose removed a link to a pull request Jun 26, 2024
@libbyrose libbyrose linked a pull request Jun 26, 2024 that will close this issue
@libbyrose libbyrose reopened this Jun 26, 2024
@gamedaygeorge
Copy link

@m-mohr Adding this discussion from #32. This does seem like a future topic, and perhaps needs a bit more context and a specific use case to work out if machine readability is desired, and if so how best to implement.

Looking down the track, another question: could this approach be used to automate the process in other useful ways? e.g. does this make the PFS more machine readable, opening up the possibility of scripting or tools reading the PFS directly?

Good question, in principle we could even move away from Markdown and generate this even more automatically from some kind of e.g. YAML files that are a bit more structured. And also we could actually generate them from individual building blocks so that they may only be written once and are re-used in the PFSes. But maybe that's a step for the future...?

@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-mohr commented Jun 27, 2024

I'm running into more and more issues with Markdown. The Markdown syntax is too simple for what we are trying to achieve here, especially with vasts amounts of tables. => #38

@m-mohr m-mohr linked a pull request Sep 23, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment