From a6296dc699398ee964c0c98b0abf0eefa5099f37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carsten Bormann Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:47:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify that no use case for .jsonseq *in CDDL* is known --- draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control.md b/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control.md index 00eed7c..f28dbe2 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control.md +++ b/draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control.md @@ -269,7 +269,9 @@ claims = {iss: text, exp: text} ~~~ {: sourcecode-name="example3.cddl"} -Note that a `.jsonseq` is not provided, as no use case is known yet. +Note that a `.jsonseq` is not provided for {{-jsonseq}}, as no use case +for inclusion in CDDL is known yet. + There is no way to constrain the use of blank space in data items to be validated; variants (e.g, not providing for any blank space) could be defined.