We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It will be worth to add the Linter check for the GH action workflow files, since it's not so easy to test them.
Linter
Found the blazing-fast tool: https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint
Downloaded binary and tested on the PR: #663
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
FYI @samarth9008 @sonniki @heanhsok
Sorry, something went wrong.
A good thing but what made us file this issue now and how urgent is this?
what made us file this issue
There was an indentation-related mistake in #663. It’s always better to include checks like this in the Linter.
how urgent is this?
Low priority.
Perfect for a bounty.
No branches or pull requests
Description
It will be worth to add the
Linter
check for the GH action workflow files, since it's not so easy to test them.Found the blazing-fast tool:
https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint
Downloaded binary and tested on the PR:
#663
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: