We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
promote_charm.yaml
The secrets.CHARMHUB_TOKEN and secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN secrets used in the promote_charm.yaml that is not defined as arguments. https://github.com/canonical/operator-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/promote_charm.yaml
secrets.CHARMHUB_TOKEN
secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN
Can it be changed to:
on: workflow_call: inputs: origin-channel: type: string description: 'Origin Channel' destination-channel: type: string description: 'Destination Channel' secrets: CHARMHIB_TOKEN: required: true GITHUB_TOKEN: required: true
So it is clearer, to users the names of secrets to be passed.
Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#onworkflow_callsecrets
Should I create a pull request for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Makes sense to me. :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The
secrets.CHARMHUB_TOKEN
andsecrets.GITHUB_TOKEN
secrets used in thepromote_charm.yaml
that is not defined as arguments.https://github.com/canonical/operator-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/promote_charm.yaml
Can it be changed to:
So it is clearer, to users the names of secrets to be passed.
Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#onworkflow_callsecrets
Should I create a pull request for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: