Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: some missing operators in SHS Stops Export #1216

Closed
edasmalchi opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Bug: some missing operators in SHS Stops Export #1216

edasmalchi opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working open-data Work related to publishing, ingesting open data

Comments

@edasmalchi
Copy link
Member

edasmalchi commented Aug 28, 2024

Uriel noticed that the export from #1160 didn't include SBMTD and would like to have those stops included so that he has as close to a complete census of stops along the SHS as possible.

Long Beach and B-Line are also not included due to #3383.

SBMTD is present in the warehouse for Aug 14 but apparently didn't make it through the open data publishing process #1204 actually not present for Aug 14 but avail for July date, SBMTD apparently uploaded a new feed before Aug 14 with no service defined until Aug 19, which results in no data from the upload date to the service definition date per cal-itp/data-infra#1300

I will go back far enough to get the most recent data available for each omitted operator and append it to the export.

@edasmalchi edasmalchi added bug Something isn't working open-data Work related to publishing, ingesting open data labels Aug 28, 2024
@edasmalchi edasmalchi self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
@evansiroky
Copy link
Member

#3383 has been resolved. @edasmalchi can you confirm if everything is looking good now?

@edasmalchi
Copy link
Member Author

Briefly tried to rerun gtfs_funnel for august and it didn't seem to pick it up, but I'd need to investigate more to figure out why...

#1217 did get Uriel what he needed in the short term, but I'll leave this open for now until I can circle back

@tiffanychu90
Copy link
Member

Adding a new date in rt_dates and then changing the reference in update_vars would get you to run make download_gtfs_data

@edasmalchi
Copy link
Member Author

yeah, I was thinking the warehouse might have backfilled the August date though? perhaps not, I haven't tried adding a new date yet

@edasmalchi
Copy link
Member Author

see #1225

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working open-data Work related to publishing, ingesting open data
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants