author | date |
---|---|
Dave Abrahams |
2014-04-10 |
- Performance equivalent to C arrays for subscript get/set of non-class element types is the most important performance goal.
- It should be possible to receive an
NSArray
from Cocoa, represent it as anArray<AnyObject>
, and pass it right back to Cocoa as anNSArray
in O(1) and with no memory allocations. - Arrays should be usable as stacks, so we want amortized O(1) append
and O(1) popBack. Together with goal #1, this implies a
std::vector
-like layout, with a reserved tail memory capacity that can exceed the number of actual stored elements.
To achieve goals 1 and 2 together, we use static knowledge of the
element type: when it is statically known that the element type is not a
class, code and checks accounting for the possibility of wrapping an
NSArray
are eliminated. An Array
of Swift value types always uses
the most efficient possible representation, identical to that of
ContiguousArray
.
Swift provides three generic array types, all of which have amortized O(1) growth. In this document, statements about ArrayType apply to all three of the components.
-
ContiguousArray<Element>
is the fastest and simplest of the three--use this when you need "C array" performance. The elements of aContiguousArray
are always stored contiguously in memory. -
Array<Element>
is likeContiguousArray<Element>
, but optimized for efficient conversions from Cocoa and back--whenElement
can be a class type,Array<Element>
can be backed by the (potentially non-contiguous) storage of an arbitraryNSArray
rather than by a SwiftContiguousArray
.Array<Element>
also supports up- and downcasts between arrays of related class types. WhenElement
is known to be a non-class type, the performance ofArray<Element>
is identical to that ofContiguousArray<Element>
. -
ArraySlice<Element>
is a subrange of someArray<Element>
orContiguousArray<Element>
; it's the result of using slice notation, e.g.a[7...21]
on any Swift arraya
. A slice always has contiguous storage and "C array" performance. Slicing an ArrayType is O(1) unless the source is anArray<Element>
backed by anNSArray
that doesn't supply contiguous storage.ArraySlice
is recommended for transient computations but not for long-term storage. Since it references a sub-range of some shared backing buffer, aArraySlice
may artificially prolong the lifetime of elements outside theArraySlice
itself.
The ArrayTypes have full value semantics via copy-on-write (COW):
var a = [1, 2, 3]
let b = a
a[1] = 42
print(b[1]) // prints "2"
-
Every class type or
@objc
existential (such asAnyObject
) is bridged to Objective-C and bridged back to Swift via the identity transformation, i.e. it is bridged verbatim. -
A type
T
that is not bridged verbatim can conform toBridgedToObjectiveC
, which specifies its conversions to and from Objective-C:protocol _BridgedToObjectiveC { typealias _ObjectiveCType: AnyObject func _bridgeToObjectiveC() -> _ObjectiveCType class func _forceBridgeFromObjectiveC(_: _ObjectiveCType) -> Self }
Classes and
@objc
existentials shall not conform to_BridgedToObjectiveC
, a restriction that's not currently enforceable at compile-time. -
Some generic types (
Array<T>
in particular) bridge to Objective-C only if their element types bridge. These types conform to_ConditionallyBridgedToObjectiveC
:protocol _ConditionallyBridgedToObjectiveC : _BridgedToObjectiveC { class func _isBridgedToObjectiveC() -> Bool class func _conditionallyBridgeFromObjectiveC(_: _ObjectiveCType) -> Self? }
Bridging from, or bridging back to, a type
T
conforming to_ConditionallyBridgedToObjectiveC
whenT._isBridgedToObjectiveC()
isfalse
is a user programming error that may be diagnosed at runtime._conditionallyBridgeFromObjectiveC
can be used to attempt to bridge back, and returnnil
if the entire object cannot be bridged.There are various ways to move this detection to compile-time
-
For a type
T
that is not bridged verbatim,-
if
T
conforms toBridgedToObjectiveC
and eitherT
does not conform to_ConditionallyBridgedToObjectiveC
- or,
T._isBridgedToObjectiveC()
then a value
x
of typeT
is bridged asT._ObjectiveCType
viax._bridgeToObjectiveC()
, and an objecty
ofT._ObjectiveCType
is bridged back toT
viaT._forceBridgeFromObjectiveC(y)
-
Otherwise,
T
does not bridge to Objective-C
-
-
From here on, this document deals only with Array
itself, and not
Slice
or ContiguousArray
, which support a subset of Array
's
conversions. Future revisions will add descriptions of Slice
and
ContiguousArray
conversions.
In these definitions, Base
is AnyObject
or a trivial subtype
thereof, Derived
is a trivial subtype of Base
, and X
conforms to
_BridgedToObjectiveC
:
-
Trivial bridging implicitly converts
[Base]
toNSArray
in O(1). This is simply a matter of returning the Array's internal buffer, which is-aNSArray
. -
Trivial bridging back implicitly converts
NSArray
to[AnyObject]
in O(1) plus the cost of callingcopy()
on theNSArray
.1 -
Implicit conversions between
Array
types- Implicit upcasting implicitly converts
[Derived]
to[Base]
in O(1). - Implicit bridging implicitly converts
[X]
to[X._ObjectiveCType]
in O(N).
Either type of implicit conversion may be combined with [trivial bridging](#trivial bridging) in an implicit conversion to
NSArray
. - Implicit upcasting implicitly converts
-
Checked conversions convert
[T]
to[U]?
in O(N) viaa as [U]
.- Checked downcasting converts
[Base]
to[Derived]?
. - Checked bridging back converts
[T]
to[X]?
whereX._ObjectiveCType
isT
or a trivial subtype thereof.
- Checked downcasting converts
-
Forced conversions convert
[AnyObject]
orNSArray
to[T]
implicitly, in bridging thunks between Swift and Objective-C.For example, when a user writes a Swift method taking
[NSView]
, it is exposed to Objective-C as a method takingNSArray
, which is force-converted to[NSView]
when called from Objective-C.- Forced downcasting converts
[AnyObject]
to[Derived]
in O(1) - Forced bridging back converts
[AnyObject]
to[X]
in O(N).
A forced conversion where any element fails to convert is considered a user programming error that may trap. In the case of forced downcasts, the trap may be deferred to the point where an offending element is accessed.
- Forced downcasting converts
Both checked and forced downcasts may be combined with [trivial bridging
back](#trivial bridging back) in conversions from NSArray
.
Both upcasts and forced downcasts raise type-safety issues.
TODO: this section is outdated.
When up-casting an [Derived]
to [Base]
, a buffer of Derived
object
can simply be unsafeBitCast
'ed to a buffer of elements of type
Base
--as long as the resulting buffer is never mutated. For example,
we cannot allow a Base
element to be inserted in the buffer, because
the buffer's destructor will destroy the elements with the (incorrect)
static presumption that they have Derived
type.
Furthermore, we can't (logically) copy the buffer just prior to
mutation, since the [Base]
may be copied prior to mutation, and our
shared subscript assignment semantics imply that all copies must observe
its subscript assignments.
Therefore, converting [T]
to [U]
is akin to resizing: the new
Array
becomes logically independent. To avoid an immediate O(N)
conversion cost, and preserve shared subscript assignment semantics, we
use a layer of indirection in the data structure. Further, when T
is a
subclass of U
, the intermediate object is marked to prevent in-place
mutation of the buffer; it will be copied upon its first mutation:
In forced downcasts, if any element fails to have dynamic type
Derived
, it is considered a programming error that may cause a trap.
Sometimes we can do this check in O(1) because the source holds a known
buffer type. Rather than incur O(N) checking for the other cases, the
new intermediate object is marked for deferred checking, and all element
accesses through that object are dynamically typechecked, with a trap
upon failure (except in -Ounchecked
builds).
When the resulting array is later up-cast (other than to a type that can be validated in O(1) by checking the type of the underlying buffer), the result is also marked for deferred checking.
Footnotes
-
This
copy()
may amount to a retain if theNSArray
is already known to be immutable. We could eventually optimize out the copy if we can detect that theNSArray
is uniquely referenced. Our current unique-reference detection applies only to Swift objects, though. ↩