Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the mismatch in the size of the training and inference inputs #36

Open
Albert22dai opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Albert22dai
Copy link

hello, I input the patch size of the network during training as (50,150,150), and use the model parameters reserved for training for inference, and the patch size of the input network during inference is (100,150,150), which will cause the inference output to be abnormal, does it have to strictly match the patch size of training and inference, which is unnecessary for CNN networks?
best wishes to you

@cabooster
Copy link
Owner

Hi Albert22dai. We always used the same patch size for training and inference. Only when the patch size is relatively small, different patch size will lead to different results. Since the receptive field of our network is 90, I think you can use a larger patch size.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants