Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to reproduce performance, PQ=0 #31

Open
zhaoyangwei123 opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Unable to reproduce performance, PQ=0 #31

zhaoyangwei123 opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@zhaoyangwei123
Copy link

Hello author, I attempted to replicate the performance of fcclip-r50 on the Coco dataset using the checkpoint you provided, but did not achieve satisfactory results. The performance of panoramic segmentation and semantic segmentation on the Coco dataset was always 0, but the results of instance segmentation can be replicated. What is the reason for this?
[06/03 13:07:59 d2.evaluation.panoptic_evaluation]: Panoptic Evaluation Results:

PQ SQ RQ #categories
All 0.000 0.000 0.000 133
Things 0.000 0.000 0.000 80
Stuff 0.000 0.000 0.000 53

[06/03 13:08:30 d2.evaluation.testing]: copypaste: AP,AP50,AP75,APs,APm,APl
[06/03 13:08:30 d2.evaluation.testing]: copypaste: 40.6584,63.1976,43.7951,21.7050,44.9967,60.3094

[06/03 13:08:30 d2.evaluation.testing]: copypaste: Task: sem_seg
[06/03 13:08:30 d2.evaluation.testing]: copypaste: mIoU,fwIoU,mACC,pACC
[06/03 13:08:30 d2.evaluation.testing]: copypaste: 0.4226,1.6011,1.2336,2.6937

At the same time, I found that when I run Python datasets/prepare_coco_semantic-annos-from_panoptic-annos.py to extract semantic annotations from panoptic annotations, I get panoptic_semseg_ {train,val}2017 All of them are as follows, is this because there is an issue with the annotations?

000000001503

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant