-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for NUMA syscalls #937
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
It's in scope, just not implemented yet. An MR would be welcome! |
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 20, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
Ok, #938 is a start, but doesn't add all the syscalls, or even all the modes of |
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 29, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
krh
added a commit
to krh/rustix
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2023
…ealliance#937) This adds support for the `mbind`, `set_mempolicy` and `get_mempolicy` NUMA syscalls. The `get_mempolicy` syscall has a few different modes of operation, depending on the flags, which is demultiplexed into `get_mempolicy_node` and `get_mempolicy_next_node` for now. There's a couple of other modes that writes into the variable length bit array, which aren't implemented for now.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Any plans for adding support for NUMA syscalls?
I could write up a MR for this, unless it's something that's been deemed out of scope?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: