Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a path for integration tests #259

Closed
dmikusa opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Provide a path for integration tests #259

dmikusa opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
type:enhancement A general enhancement

Comments

@dmikusa
Copy link
Contributor

dmikusa commented Oct 3, 2023

Split from #53.

We should consider adding utilities for integration testing buildpacks (possibly in a separate library) that possibly uses pack and docker. Example of something like this https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/occam

Alternatively, we could endorse using occam and update docs to reflect this.

@loewenstein
Copy link

Alternatively, we could endorse using occam and update docs to reflect this.

We really should not reinvent occam. Either use it from where it currently lives or approach the occam maintainers if they could see moving into the cnb project.

@dmikusa
Copy link
Contributor Author

dmikusa commented Jun 19, 2024

This hasn't received any positive feedback or interest, and in the interest of house keeping, I'm going to close this and suggest that if folks are looking for a way to do integration testing, then they should take a look at https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/occam.

@dmikusa dmikusa closed this as completed Jun 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants