You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I work as a fire protection engineer developing 3D fire models. I would like to request IFC classes for objects representing fire protection requirements.
I think it's a real issue that there are no suitable classes for objects that are representative of fire protection requirements. Instead we are using a variety of other classes that end up adding our representative components to the same classes as actual building components which is far from ideal.
The fire model is quickly becoming a natural part of the modeling package in projects and currently the lack of appropriate ifc classes is creating a situation where projects are opting to filter out fire information in different ways when the ifc is the primary information model. This creates quality risks and it is certainly not a wanted outcome that the fire model becomes a problem for the project as we are trying to ramp up the ways in which it can be helpful for projects.
I realize there is no standard for how these elements should be categorized, but we need to move forward with something. I see this as a real quality issue in our models.
KR
Rebecca Hedberg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I work as a fire protection engineer developing 3D fire models. I would like to request IFC classes for objects representing fire protection requirements.
I think it's a real issue that there are no suitable classes for objects that are representative of fire protection requirements. Instead we are using a variety of other classes that end up adding our representative components to the same classes as actual building components which is far from ideal.
The fire model is quickly becoming a natural part of the modeling package in projects and currently the lack of appropriate ifc classes is creating a situation where projects are opting to filter out fire information in different ways when the ifc is the primary information model. This creates quality risks and it is certainly not a wanted outcome that the fire model becomes a problem for the project as we are trying to ramp up the ways in which it can be helpful for projects.
I realize there is no standard for how these elements should be categorized, but we need to move forward with something. I see this as a real quality issue in our models.
KR
Rebecca Hedberg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: