We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Our current StringFormat implementation is balking at the cel-python types we're using. Additionally, the protovalidate-conformance suite only really tests the %s verb, so we ought to have tests over the rest of the verbs.
%s
The cel-spec test suite for formatting can be found here: https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/master/tests/simple/testdata/string_ext.textproto. Here is cel-go's explanation of how format should work.
Additionally, while we currently can add these tests in-repo, it'd behoove us to contribute a conformant implementation upstream to cel-python.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Our current StringFormat implementation is balking at the cel-python types we're using. Additionally, the protovalidate-conformance suite only really tests the
%sverb, so we ought to have tests over the rest of the verbs.The cel-spec test suite for formatting can be found here: https://github.com/google/cel-spec/blob/master/tests/simple/testdata/string_ext.textproto. Here is cel-go's explanation of how format should work.
Additionally, while we currently can add these tests in-repo, it'd behoove us to contribute a conformant implementation upstream to cel-python.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: