You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm currently seeing slightly worse performance from a 16 PE (16 EPB) build of DANA than with a 3 PE (4EPB) build. This is across different networks including networks that should have a lot of work (e.g., xor-sigmoid-128o). I've only tested this for learning test cases. The scaling here should be roughly linear and align with the old results showing this. This makes no sense and is either some bug in how the cycles and performance are being computed or this is some unintentional artifact of the X-FILES/DANA split.
This is arguably an indication that we need to be doing performance monitoring with the regression testing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm currently seeing slightly worse performance from a 16 PE (16 EPB) build of DANA than with a 3 PE (4EPB) build. This is across different networks including networks that should have a lot of work (e.g., xor-sigmoid-128o). I've only tested this for learning test cases. The scaling here should be roughly linear and align with the old results showing this. This makes no sense and is either some bug in how the cycles and performance are being computed or this is some unintentional artifact of the X-FILES/DANA split.
This is arguably an indication that we need to be doing performance monitoring with the regression testing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: