Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normalization of a Shock? #57

Open
JustinEloriaga opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Normalization of a Shock? #57

JustinEloriaga opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@JustinEloriaga
Copy link

Is there anyway to impose a normalization on the shock. For example, Arias, Caldara, and Rubio Ramirez's paper typically imposes a normalization of a 25bps hike in the MP shock identified.

@donotdespair
Copy link
Member

Hi Justin @JustinEloriaga

Thanks for reaching out! No, there isn't any automated way of doing this ATM. But once you create the object of class PosteriorIR using the function compute_impulse_responses() you can simply rescale appropriate entries of the NxNx(horizon+1)xS array. If you apply function plot() to such rescaled output it will respect the new entries in the PosteriorIR object. This of course works for teh IRF rescaling. Outer outputs would have to be rescaled accordingly. But it's possible manually.

Let me know if that's clear.

Greetings, Tomasz

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants