Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include OHM-specific presets when editing OpenHistoricaMap #798

Open
ooosssay opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Include OHM-specific presets when editing OpenHistoricaMap #798

ooosssay opened this issue Jul 28, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@ooosssay
Copy link

Possibly have start_date=, end_date=, and sources= be placed on top of description in the Common Tags page when the user has selected the OpenHistoricalMap server.

@1ec5
Copy link
Contributor

1ec5 commented Jul 28, 2024

Specifically, in an OHM editing context, every feature whatsoever would have these fields somewhere near the top.

In the long run, OpenHistoricalMap/issues#777 would allow Go Map!! to avoid special-casing specific servers and fields.

@ooosssay
Copy link
Author

Oh yeah that would definitely be better

@ooosssay
Copy link
Author

Should I leave this open but change the title to something along the lines of “Future support for OHM id tagging schema”?

@bryceco bryceco changed the title New order and recommended tags for OpenHistoricaMap Include OHM-specific presets when editing OpenHistoricaMap Jul 28, 2024
@bryceco
Copy link
Owner

bryceco commented Jul 28, 2024

If you're editing OHM you can use the "Customize Presets" button to add those missing fields to Common Tags.

@ooosssay
Copy link
Author

Omg I somehow missed that button I didn’t even know that button existed until now

@bryceco
Copy link
Owner

bryceco commented Jul 28, 2024

Yeah, as the number of presets has grown that button has gotten harder and harder to notice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants